3 ms·

> It’s certainly not going to write films and television most people are ever going to want to watch. Time will tell, but I think you're wrong. I've heard way

by ta8645 3y ago

> It’s certainly not going to write films and television most people are ever going to want to watch. Time will tell, but I think you're wrong. I've heard way too many people say "computers will never X" in my life, only to see it to come to pass. Computers will never provide useful language translation... Computers will never be controlled by human speech... Chess computers will never beat the best humans... etc.

LapsangGuzzler 3y ago
I agree with this, but I also think we’re going to start to see a social rejection of AI being applied this way if things continue. It’s threatening so many people across so many industries that I think it will become a brand risk to companies, particularly in high profile industries like entertainment. Anecdotally, I watched the new Indiana Jones movie and I found the de-aging scene to be so weird and creepy, the friends I was there with felt the same and it was widely discussed among reviewers and critics. It really represents the planned uselessness of humanity in the AI era and I think more people are going to wake up to that reality as time goes by.
bugglebeetle 3y ago
And yet humans still play chess with each other, casually and competitively, translate each others works, etc. It turns out that just because you can make a computer do something doesn’t mean you should or that most people will enjoy the fruits of that effort for things that give their lives meaning (vs. that which they’re forced to do as work in order to survive). This is especially true of art. We’ve had generative art since the 1960s at least and yet most people would still prefer to wander around Rome and visit art museums than type “anime waifu trending on artstation” into Midjourney.
- ta8645 3y ago
  And people play chess with computers, use Google Translate, etc. Doing so does not preclude the other. But that really isn't what is being discussed in this thread at all, which is simply whether computers will be able to perform this task or not. From my vantage point, I wouldn't put money against it coming to pass. As a personal anecdote, the relevance of which just occurred to me, I attended a birthday party recently of regular church going people -- no techies in the crowd. An older gentleman got up and read a story that he had asked ChatGPT to create for the occasion. Everyone was laughing. Perhaps it's a one time novelty. But the average guy may be more accepting of it than we guess.
  - bugglebeetle 3y ago
    See, this is what I’m talking about. It can’t even come up with a plausible anecdote for this rebuttal.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]

by ta8645 3y ago

LapsangGuzzler 3y ago

I agree with this, but I also think we’re going to start to see a social rejection of AI being applied this way if things continue. It’s threatening so many people across so many industries that I think it will become a brand risk to companies, particularly in high profile industries like entertainment. Anecdotally, I watched the new Indiana Jones movie and I found the de-aging scene to be so weird and creepy, the friends I was there with felt the same and it was widely discussed among reviewers and critics. It really represents the planned uselessness of humanity in the AI era and I think more people are going to wake up to that reality as time goes by.

bugglebeetle 3y ago

And yet humans still play chess with each other, casually and competitively, translate each others works, etc. It turns out that just because you can make a computer do something doesn’t mean you should or that most people will enjoy the fruits of that effort for things that give their lives meaning (vs. that which they’re forced to do as work in order to survive). This is especially true of art. We’ve had generative art since the 1960s at least and yet most people would still prefer to wander around Rome and visit art museums than type “anime waifu trending on artstation” into Midjourney.

ta8645 3y ago
And people play chess with computers, use Google Translate, etc. Doing so does not preclude the other. But that really isn't what is being discussed in this thread at all, which is simply whether computers will be able to perform this task or not. From my vantage point, I wouldn't put money against it coming to pass. As a personal anecdote, the relevance of which just occurred to me, I attended a birthday party recently of regular church going people -- no techies in the crowd. An older gentleman got up and read a story that he had asked ChatGPT to create for the occasion. Everyone was laughing. Perhaps it's a one time novelty. But the average guy may be more accepting of it than we guess.
- bugglebeetle 3y ago
  See, this is what I’m talking about. It can’t even come up with a plausible anecdote for this rebuttal.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]