Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ta8645
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
451.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
The What's New page says they support the "Novation Launchpad Pro", but the picture beside that paragraph actually is the much more expensive "Novation Launchpad Pro [MK3]". (Ambiguous product names like this are m
452.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> ... oil canning. This isn't likely to happen, but we could learn to just not care. We have bigger problems than worrying about our car's cosmetics. A lot of a car's cost is due to the high cost of perfect finishes. I&#
453.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
As far as I can tell, you're relying on Google, or Microsoft, etc to verify your identity. Lose your relationship with them, and you lose control of everything. You have to remain in their good graces, or lose your identity for a div
454.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Every visitor would have to manually trust them; provided they're using a browser that still allows them to do so.
455.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> The Chinese Room is a good example if you want deeper thought into the distinction between acting and being. It's not a deeper thought at all. It's an appeal to the emotion of humans who want to believe that what we do in ou
456.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> Being able to mix what you have seen before But humans clearly do that. It's not all we do, but we clearly do that. And given the impressive results that LLMs produce, my guess is it or something like it, will play a significant
457.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> That is a strawman, basically nobody argues this. Some people do. Some people believe that intelligence is much more fundamental to the universe, and not capable of being reproduced mechanistically. But if you grant that it is possible
458.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> People said this about calculators as well, or initial chess AI as well. "If computers can do this, then the remaining parts of intelligence is probably not hard to reproduce!". People also said that chess computers would nev
459.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> they are not like humans at all, and only resemble them superficially due to our anthropomorphic tendency to infer a mind upon seeing fluent and roughly correspondent text. Alternatively, we overestimate human abilities, and imbue our
460.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Wrong. The point is that you could have seen it coming. And you sow the seeds of it happening again when you think of opposition to Discord as an ideological stance, rather than one that promotes a practical structure which guards against
461.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Unity is the best game engine. People who will sacrifice that for ideological purity are a minority. I'm sure that will work out great for them.
462.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> What is not working, is people are not comparing all prices or they are not available. You're not hearing the argument. It's not my argument. It's the way markets are meant to operate. You don't need to ask anyone
463.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
That sounds like things are working as they should. Prices for scarce resources should naturally go up, and down if there is lots of competition. If someone is charging too much, they won't sell as much as someone who sets a reasonabl
464.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Why doesn't supply and demand work to set the prices properly in this case?
465.
▲
Terminal Click – Abner Coimbre – Software You Can Love Vancouver 2023
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
ta8645
3y ago
|
0 comments
466.
▲
Urgent appeal to get flu jab after virus killed more than Covid last winter
(mirror.co.uk)
42 points
by
ta8645
3y ago
|
18 comments
467.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
I see you're playing the 100% end of that range, by claiming that "everything" conforms to your insight.
468.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
I had an older family member who fell victim to a very similar scam. Once she installed their remote software, they connected and used her browser to transfer a large sum, from one of her bank accounts into her main bank account. They then
469.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> The radial symmetry of gravity, for instance, is critical to understanding why penguins aren’t constantly falling off Antarctica. I don't understand how your point challenges the notion that people can understand something while n
470.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
The point is to not treat it like a religion. Scientific conclusions are not blessed by god as divine and absolute truth. As much as we wish the world was black and white, it's much more shades of gray, and we should each do our part
471.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
You're ignoring the universal religious faith in those institutions that has been demonstrated over the last few years. People who question them are conspiratorial dimwits, who are dangerous to society and should be punished.
472.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> we have to keep our actual belief in line with the evidence. That's what everyone does. Just with varying degrees of success and with differing levels of intellect and experience. But we are all faced with the same conundrum of e
473.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> Without capitalism, I could have control over my life. Says who? You think people in China and Russia have more control over their life than those in the west? You've still not offered anything other than wishful thinking. You&
474.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> Conspiracy theories! I hear what you're saying. In the end, we have to believe something -- on less than perfect information. But understanding human nature, isn't a conspiracy theory. And accepting obviously overreaching
475.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> In contrast, Communism's stated goal is the achievement of a classless What good is a stated goal if the reality is the opposite? Capitalism may not have a lofty sounding goal to your ear, but the fair trade of goods and services
476.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Why is it people like yourself can not learn from history? I'm all for moving in a better healthier direction, i'm not interested in repeating the mistakes of the past. For all its failings, capitalism has done more to improve t
477.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
That's human nature. You won't get a better deal in Russia, China or any theoretical utopian civilization you dream up either. I don't know what the answer is, but it sure as hell isn't blaming everything on capitalism
478.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
Did Scientific American use to have higher standards, or was I just naive when I believed them to be a respectable source for accurate information?
479.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
This hits close to home with all the appeals to authority over the last few years. With absolute confidence they were holders of the truth, "trust the science!".
480.
▲
by
ta8645
3y ago
> Cory Doctorow should be imprisoned for coining that lame-ass term. And who should we prosecute for "lame-ass" ?
More ›