t43562

37 ms·

661.
by t43562 3y ago
The smaller the company the greater the chance of that IMO. I had to do it within my company and it was all a matter of luck, timing the right manager etc. Today it wouldn't happen again. I think it's also not easy to do in a st
662.
by t43562 3y ago
I have had a rotten time so far trying to get anything to happen with my Tradfri lights - I started off assuming that all of this could be done from the commandline - no not without difficulty. How do you pair your computer's zigbee wi
663.
by t43562 3y ago
There's obviously inefficiency in the system - a big cost every time a decision involves lawyers and even more if there are juries. So we should understand that we don't have a way to be perfect and think about where to balance th
664.
by t43562 3y ago
I remember my cousin telling me how horrible it was to work at a hotel - you really found out how horrible people could be when they thought they were owed something. Staff there obviously had to put up with it because that was their job. R
665.
by t43562 3y ago
Scott Manly did a great explanation. The lander lost a rocket nozzle when it was in the final part of its descent - hovering and taking pictures of the landing site. Nozzles make the rocket's thrust much more effective so basically it
666.
by t43562 3y ago
I'm not thinking of commercial anything - just changes financed by companies that want them. Example: PyPy getting almost no funding but Microsoft getting it's JIT into cpython. Big money will be deciding what happens. We're
667.
by t43562 3y ago
I'm more worried about commercial entities gaining power - by simply employing enough people to work on something that the alternatives cannot compete. People who want "one" anything - I can sympathise with the desire for sim
668.
by t43562 3y ago
I wondered about supplying troops across the Dnieper river in Kherson. The vehicle wouldn't have to stop at any point and wouldn't need a bridge or a road. They would probably be rather more expensive and yet another thing to main
669.
by t43562 3y ago
I've been following Griffon for a while. I don't think there's a huge renaissance in the offing but their business seems to be surviving. I think it has quite important military, rescue and scientific research uses quite ap
670.
by t43562 3y ago
I think not at the moment because I don't think they effectively have a "state" emotional or otherwise. When we do create more realistic things then turning one off or resetting it might be like killing it. That will be a big
671.
by t43562 3y ago
Oddly though, there are recently a lot of people making jetpacks and hover boards and so on - as the technology to do so suddenly got good enough.
672.
by t43562 3y ago
In a sense what is an LLM but an upload. Something that listened to every word you ever said might be able to sound like you. If it could record your emotional state and other inputs over years and make a model - it might even seem like you
673.
by t43562 3y ago
Physics might seem easy to you now but flying was an impossible dream for most of history. The other problems may become more amenable - one just can't know what will happen. Amazing things like CRISPR - an incredible tool that lets us
674.
by t43562 3y ago
Thank you for the great work you've all done.
675.
by t43562 3y ago
I wish the money could be spent on PyPy but pypy has its problems - you don't get a big boost on small programs that run often because the warmup time isn't that fabulous. For larger programs like you sometimes it some incredibly
676.
by t43562 3y ago
Linux isn't what it was - it's contributed to via a lot of companies with commercial interests. The open source developers who started doing it all for love are often doing it for money now. Certain features are desired, there&#
677.
by t43562 3y ago
Poorer countries (I am from one) will want higher living standards and there are a lot of people in that condition. I think they will condone sea mining to reach them.
678.
by t43562 3y ago
That could require people to die. Also you cannot make people who are poor not want to better their lives even if it costs in the long term. How would you force them? They are going to try one way or another and all we can do is find a bet
679.
by t43562 3y ago
Yellowstone is precious because land without people on it is precious. The sea covers 71 percent of the earths surface and has no humans on it anywhere. The areas with nodules containing the the right stuff is very small from my memory - ha
680.
by t43562 3y ago
I'm enjoying artix linux with dinit. I tried a couple of other alternatives - s6 and openrc - although I wouldn't say I was that fair on openrc. dinit may lack many things - I don't know - I haven't had any reason to be
681.
by t43562 3y ago
The argument I've seen is that the amount of seabed that has the required minerals is not big and the surface of the earth is predominantly covered by water so as a percentage of what's there the mined area is small. I would like
682.
by t43562 3y ago
I made some videos introducing Go. They're not important and the view count isn't impressive at all but it interested me that the one with the most hits is about "Go Project Structure". I have to say I'm not at all
683.
by t43562 3y ago
The car manufacturers have been going after the top end of the market for obvious reasons - it's the first thing to do when your battery supply and manufacturing capacity and electronic components are or have been limited. There's
684.
by t43562 3y ago
I feel that's the way it works - not "I'll start being good tomorrow" but the way in which you change those small decisions that you make 20 times a day about whether to eat something or do some exercise or whatever. Whe
685.
by t43562 3y ago
Oh, I think that's OFTEN true. When your build gets big though - when you're building multiple packages for example of which most are not yours - the benefits can start to become more worthwhile. I currently work with people who t
686.
by t43562 3y ago
When something doesn't build properly then you start needing to know the details and your logic about how make is an implementation detail is true of everything in the end - nobody cares how builds are done compared to the thing they b
687.
by t43562 3y ago
It works on an enormous number of platforms with few dependencies. People have got these projects which build on everything from embedded platforms to mainframes and it has taken effort from many different people to achieve that. So you mig
688.
by t43562 3y ago
cmake generates makefiles (or ninja) so it doesn't replace them. It replaces autotools - it works out what features a system has and what build flags to enable and from a generic description of your program it generates makefiles or ni
689.
by t43562 3y ago
I'm glad you had success. It wouldn't be difficult to do that with inotify to run make when a file changed. OTOH with webpack and transpiling and various other things I have watched people in my company take quite a long time to
690.
by t43562 3y ago
Make exists and is used widely and not because everyone's too inept to understand your points. The "assumption-making" build tools are the unicorns that inevitably cannot dominate because they're not generally applicable

More ›