t3chn0SchO0lbus

4 ms·

1.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
Gun companies are a bad analogy because they are one of the only exceptions to having legal liability when their products kill people. Almost every other industry can be held liable if their product kills someone.
2.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
The Twitter essay is my least favorite thing about the future we live in.
3.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
"fluoride"?
4.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
I keep trying to wrap my head around the economics of this and maybe give Tether the benefit of doubt. I think the most damning technical detail is that there is no client-side wallet. We can't trade Tether amongst ourselves or engage
5.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
It doesn't have to be like that. We could rely on periodic snapshots of the blockchain for future validation. We could even selectively include specific data in the snapshots to be preserved. Maybe some group might need to store the en
6.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
I think there is a way to have users pay for transactions instead of the contracts or contract owners.
7.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
The hackers still have their assets as Ethereum Classic. The fact that ETC lives on is a testament to how nobody could 'take away' what is listed as theirs on the blockchain. But I don't buy this argument for video games. Mos
8.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
"I can look through all of my emails before the end of the day"
9.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
>That would be an enormously stupid attempt at insider trading. A stupid crime is still a crime. It could all be coincidence that his biggest selloff came just after he learned of the vulnerability but the circumstances merit investigati
10.
by t3chn0SchO0lbus 9y ago
Children.