t0rakka

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by t0rakka 2y ago

   What do you mean and? The implications are implicit; any vulnerability will be unpatched, so bad actor (tm) has to know only ONE vulnerability after XP support was ceased. If he has means of talking to the machine through TCP/IP or UDP
2. 2.▲
   by t0rakka 5y ago

   I wrote a small test bench for my own uses as wanted to compare with different codecs and see how "raw compression" would work, how would QOI+ZSTD combination work and so on. Here's example output.. image: 1502 x 1800 ( 1
3. 3.▲
   by t0rakka 7y ago

   Guilty as charged.. the 1% was a napkin estimate. The True Cost in this specific case is (0..7 bits to fill a byte) + 2 bytes for the RST marker for each interval. 320x240 image and RST interval for each 240/8 block means 30 RST's
4. 4.▲
   by t0rakka 8y ago

   Found the file. 230 ms decode and 96 ms encode on i9 7900x. :)
5. 5.▲
   by t0rakka 8y ago

   Timings with the original test image ( https://www.eso.org/public/archives/print_posters/large/prin... ) 9933 x 7016 (7.4 MB) load turbojpeg: 309 ms load mango: 225 ms save turbojpeg:
6. 6.▲
   by t0rakka 9y ago

   https://github.com/t0rakka/mango