szmarczak

6 ms·

61.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
Nothing you wrote makes sense. The limits are so Anthropic isn't on a loss. If they can customize Claude using Code, I see no reason why they couldn't do so with other wrappers. Other wrappers can also make use of cache. If you wo
62.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
Why ban third party wrappers? All of this could've been sidestepped had you not banned them.
63.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
Wow, the difference between AI and non-AI images collapses. I hate the future where I won't be able to tell the difference.
64.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 thinking duplicates what it has said, wasting tokens
3 points by szmarczak 6mo ago|0 comments
65.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
> It can’t detect the interception What's stopping the process from reading its own memory and seeing that the syscall was patched?
66.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
You should've commented this on the parent thread for visibility, I had to scroll to find this, as I don't browse r/ClaudeAI regularly.
67.
AI slop has hit the science creators [video](youtube.com)
2 points by szmarczak 6mo ago|0 comments
68.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
SVGs on Firefox are broken (like 0.1% of the size it needs to be).
69.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
I'm on the Free tier using Claude exclusively for consultation (send third party codebase + ask why/where is something done). I also used to struggle to hit limits. Recently I was able hit the limit after a single prompt.
70.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
As per the quotes, it could've been that he had read them, liked them and kept repeating them. However given other matching circumstances such as grammar this becomes unlikely. Also, this is just a single journalist; to know precisely
71.
by szmarczak 6mo ago
> misidentification We don't know if that's misidentification either. The author provides good evidence that the writing style matches, which doesn't provide a strong proof, however it's a good clue of who might it be
72.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> Unfortunately, it's been an absolutely brutal market for new graduates. Furthermore, more and more companies are looking for "professional" devs using AI tools such as Claude Code. By "professional" I mean prof
73.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
He's just incompetent: 1. He blames the maintainer that his distro doesn't ship latest neovim. 2. He didn't pull neovim from the Extra-Testing Arch branch. 3. He didn't pull neovim from AUR. 4. He doesn't have the k
74.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
Yes, but you aren't going to give your teacher a remarkable to take home. Hence a sheet of paper comes in handy :)
75.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> The overall consensus among parents is that books are way better than screens for kids Any scientific backing that screens are at fault? I don't think so. E-ink tablets do exist. When I'm having children, I'm buying th
76.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> I don’t use the mouse when editing code, so this particular mistake does not happen to me. Fair point. > Less visual noise. It doesn't solve this problem of your eyes guessing the correct indentation, especially when using two
77.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> I never find myself just randomly inserting characters. Hasn't it ever occured to you trying to insert a space at your mouse but your cursor wasn't there? People sometimes forget to click (or think the cursor is already there
78.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> and not realizing the braces don't match. Make your IDE highlight the current section or display a hint showing starting bracket. For example, C++ devs do #endif // #if ... Too many brackets? Refactor - problem solved.
79.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> whitespace/indent languages make it clear there's a lot of redundancy there too. The only purpose for whitespace indentation is to make the code easier on the eyes. A space shouldn't have an impact in terms of execution,
80.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> human only looking at the indentation and not realizing the braces don't match. If it ever gets to that point, a refactor is obligatory. Don't give the human tools to make easy mistakes. Any grammar can be abused, so blame th
81.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
It's not. Your eyes can deceive you by guessing the correct indentation. Indentation should never be used for grammar separation. Explicit characters such as } ] ) are clearer and unambiguous.
82.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
Indeed, you're right. However, it still needs to encode and decode strings. WASM just needs native interop.
83.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> Attempted Fix: Skip the JSON Round-Trip > We integrated serde-wasm-bindgen So you're reinventing JSON but binary? V8 JSON nowadays is highly optimized [1] and can process gigabytes per second [2], I doubt it is a bottleneck her
84.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> I'm really struggling to understand how Anthropic is benefited by not allowing this. Closed ecosystem like Apple. They want you to use their tools, not someone else's.
85.
Gamers Nexus: Nvidia Says You're "Completely Wrong" About DLSS 5 Being Slop [video](youtube.com)
2 points by szmarczak 7mo ago|1 comments
86.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
HN comments isn't a place to advertise your product.
87.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> Not allowing AI assistance on PRs will likely decimate the project in the future, as it will not allow fast iteration speeds compared to other alternatives. It's not an AI issue. Node.js itself is lots of legacy code and many proj
88.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> The guidelines are only worth having I'm not saying they aren't. [1] This question is trash as well. I admit I got baited. My bad. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47406857
89.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
Immoral behavior needs to be called out. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47274075
90.
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> post-game analysis can detect it. Not with 100% accuracy. This means some legitimate players would be qualified as potentially cheating. You don't have to play with wallhacks constantly on, you can toggle. And it doesn't dete

More ›