4 ms·
> The overall consensus among parents is that books are way better than screens for kids Any scientific backing that screens are at fault? I don't think so. E-
by szmarczak 7mo ago
> The overall consensus among parents is that books are way better than screens for kids
Any scientific backing that screens are at fault? I don't think so. E-ink tablets do exist. When I'm having children, I'm buying them a remarkable with all the books scanned. Sure, they still need physical sheets of paper and a pen, but they don't have to carry 2-3 kgs of literature.
The major reason against digital literature is that it's free, book authors wouldn't get paid and books wouldn't get sold (Wikipedia / OpenStax / pirated books). Money. It's always been about money.
- SSLy 7mo agoremarkable also, as the name implies, can be used as a notebook ;-)
- szmarczak 7mo agoYes, but you aren't going to give your teacher a remarkable to take home. Hence a sheet of paper comes in handy :)
- darkwater 7mo agoIt's not that simple, at all. Any kind of electronic device adds a complexity that many HNers tend to underestimate. Giving an e-ink device would probably be the best approach but you have to manage them at scale, and I don't think there is any solution out of the box right now. But to give a general computing device like an iPad or a Chromebook to teenagers was going to end like this from day 0.
- FarmerPotato 7mo agoSee Hana Goldin, MLIS: What Scrolling Did to Reading. Lots to think about there. https://open.substack.com/pub/cardcatalogforlife/p/what-scrolling-did-to-reading https://open.substack.com/pub/cardcatalogforlife/p/what-scro...
- tzs 7mo agoI have personally found it is often easier to find things in a physical book. Say I want to look up an equation that I remember learning about from a particular book. If it was a physical book there is a good chance I will remember a place for the equation, say about 3/4 of the way through the book, near the top of a left hand page and the right had page had a graph showing solutions of the equation. I can then quickly riffle through the book to find that spot. With an ebook I get much less sense of place. If what I read on has consistent paging so I've always seen that equation at the same place on the screen I might remember that but not much more. If the "search" function in the reader software isn't good enough to find the equation and I can't think of enough prose that was around it to find it by searching for that it is going to be harder to find than it is in the physical book. I think the physical books is activating the same mental facilities that are used to organize memories of a physical journey through a space. An ebook doesn't do that for me.