sysbin

20 ms·

271.
by sysbin 7y ago
I'm surprised how well an engineer needed to make this device, would actually go ahead and make it with the obvious purpose understood.
272.
by sysbin 7y ago
Idk, injustice is a human expression and shared between one another as a word. Maybe it doesn't exist or maybe people can still find injustice towards their existence. The meaning of a lot of words can sure take a different shape with
273.
by sysbin 7y ago
I'm guessing this can be policed by a service allowing the user to see a map containing location detail & time accessed information per apps installed. Thus, showing the user which apps installed are signaling with bluetooth and wh
274.
by sysbin 7y ago
Please, let's not kid ourselves about what actually is life saving intervention for a person. It downplays the need for funding and we're already dealing with a lot of suicides per day.
275.
by sysbin 7y ago
I agree with mostly everything except when it comes to drugs I’m not impressed. My perspective is that a large crowd of potential buyers must need the “researchers find the new drug results exiting” to actually make their transactions. Simi
276.
by sysbin 7y ago
I feel like you’re making a straw man argument to my original point. Rules can change, get better or worse and effect society in a little way. I have no problem with that! I’m not saying if someone cannot follow a rule it’s not good. I’m sa
277.
by sysbin 7y ago
Words are for sharing human expression. Your interpretation of a something being a rule, is rigged when it's not possible for a person to follow it by choice. I think it's best to talk about how people don't have free will an
278.
by sysbin 7y ago
Rules are not rules when a person cannot not break them because of no control over the events in their life and their genetics leading them to break these rules. I'm not saying it's fair that we don't allow people to be free
279.
by sysbin 7y ago
See my comments to other replies. The simplest description of the justice system upon society is constructing deterrents for actions decided as bad. The argument that people need to believe in free will to be good people hasn't been pr
280.
by sysbin 7y ago
I wouldn't view things as hopeless & useless until people completely abandon reason and rational for progressing the system of society. Determinism doesn't make me feel hopeless or useless because I can see faults in a system
281.
by sysbin 7y ago
You're imposing a nihilistic view upon me. I'm proposing we don't ignore the evidence and make an antiquated system be designed properly.
282.
by sysbin 7y ago
Why does software update? We want to have it become better and the summation of your comment is imposing a nihilistic view that nothing needs to change if it's all fated to happen. That's contrary to how humans strive for increasi
283.
by sysbin 7y ago
I didn't write anything of the sort by you referring to unfixable.
284.
by sysbin 7y ago
I'm basically saying, there's no evidence for free will and the evidence that exists shows free will cannot exist. It intrigues me how people understand we had no choice in the life we're born into but people like to assume c
285.
by sysbin 7y ago
Free will being an illusion is denoting free will isn't real and in the sense that you don't have any control of your life outcomes or actions you take. Research with how the brain functions shows we're unaware of making a de
286.
by sysbin 7y ago
I ask you how you think the case of being fated into a reality where your life events, turn you into a person who is eventually labeled a criminal because of the predetermined actions in a system not designed to prevent it and thus you&#x27
287.
by sysbin 7y ago
I would say barbaric for what's possible without an antiquated incorrect belief.
288.
by sysbin 7y ago
As a philosopher I tend to approach all things as objects and similar to humans with their properties that happen to be unique because of the life events not being equivalent in order or even with outcomes because of mixed order. Dehumaniza
289.
by sysbin 7y ago
I think if not discussed it will always be out of scope.
290.
by sysbin 7y ago
My perspective is people committing crimes are similar to persons suffering an illness. We as a society should be approaching both situations the same because that's how we obtain cures and not with the mindset of the current justice s
291.
by sysbin 7y ago
Both cases are handled by a punishment modal that assumes humans have free will. I wish we lived in a society that handled these cases with a rehabilitation modal and understanding free will is an illusion by determinism & how the brain
292.
by sysbin 7y ago
> refrain from killing the guilty in that case is a profound injustice. That's only the case if you believe in free will ideology. The injustice is "society" villainizing a person who had no control over their fate if you
293.
by sysbin 7y ago
I think the justice system needs to be reformed to a rehabilitation modal and before it's able to investigate one's genetic family tree for any crime. I've studied neuro science and the philosophy of determinism to realize pe
294.
by sysbin 7y ago
‘I cannot believe, today, that the world almost ignored those people and what was happening. How could we have all stood by and have let that happen? They do not owe us anything. We owe them, for what we allowed to happen to them.’ – Carrol
295.
Google LGBTQ Employees Upset about YouTube Policy(theverge.com)
7 points by sysbin 7y ago|3 comments
296.
by sysbin 7y ago
I think it’s reasonable to be a person who was sexually assaulted and decided on euthanasia after that. Even if the option of removing the memory is perfectly available. Life is sacred to some people in different unique ways. No perfect sol
297.
by sysbin 7y ago
Entering late 20s and I’m basically hoping for a next life similar to my parents generation. This generation has so many requirements thrown upon us that made living a modern day prison and only unless born into an upper class family that w
298.
by sysbin 7y ago
Definitely a culture & behaviour mix that keeps people from acting in their best interest. Might be that the current offline/online social platforms don't allow what's needed to occur. Friends might talk about being tight
299.
by sysbin 7y ago
Could also be that young people have very little representation when it comes to laws, policies and regulations.