swannodette_

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by swannodette_ 13y ago

   If that's really true for Ember.js that's great! I'm curious as to why it performs so badly? http://www.petehunt.net/react/tastejs/benchmark.html
2. 2.▲
   by swannodette_ 13y ago

   The project is async-tut1 not async-tutl. Look at your project.clj.
3. 3.▲
   by swannodette_ 13y ago

   ClojureScript has had performance escape hatches for some time. It's pretty much always possible to get the performance of hand written JS, important otherwise our data structures would be lame. We'll likely document these techniq
4. 4.▲
   by swannodette_ 13y ago

   No the post advocates generators plus a competent channel abstraction. It's going to be hard to compare generator libraries to core.async, far as I can tell none employ the comprehensive set of optimizations that we do for time and mem