swadworth

4 ms·

1.
by swadworth 12y ago
Easy. Tell your partner to kiss off. You work 40hrs a week. You won't get more than 40 hrs of productivity out of a week. So what's the point in destroying your health and interest in the project by putting in more hours?
2.
by swadworth 12y ago
Who said MITM isn't a threat? I'm talking about the difference between targeted surveillance (MITM) and dragnet surveillance. If you think you have any solution that would beat the NSA at targeted surveillance, you are dead wrong.
3.
by swadworth 12y ago
That's a retarded retort. In the SSH case you have ONE password to remember. Not one per website. Furthermore, the password never leaves your machine. Log in to a hundred websites with SSL and a password and the NSA comes along, collec
4.
by swadworth 12y ago
<keygen> can generate client side keys. It's not very good, but it exists.
5.
by swadworth 12y ago
>Brilliant, right? No, because user accounts are commonly shared Gee, I guess only I can drive my car. If only there were some way to share my car with my spouse. Like having a second set of keys or something...
6.
by swadworth 12y ago
Yet, if you call a public key/private key a lock/key respectively, then a lot more people would immediately get the concept. "You send him a copy of your lock which he uses to lock a package and return it to you. Then only yo
7.
by swadworth 12y ago
>I am not sure about this. First, there is a built in MITM attack here. This always sounds like a NSA shill argument to me. Sure, you can MITM, but then, you HAVE to MITM on the very first request of every user to make that work. That&#x