susam

50 ms·

931.
Emacs Info Expressions(susam.net)
92 points by susam 3y ago|25 comments
932.
Seven seconds: the Tower Bridge Hawker Hunter incident (2016)(aerialcombat.co.uk)
25 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
933.
The History of CP/M (1980)(retrotechnology.com)
63 points by susam 3y ago|17 comments
934.
by susam 3y ago
In case there are any DOS enthusiasts out here, a "hello, world" program written in assembly/machine code in DOS used to be as small as 23 bytes: https://github.com/susam/hello Out of these 23 bytes, 15
935.
IBM 705 Electronic Data Processing Machine (EDPM) (1955) [pdf](archive.computerhistory.org)
4 points by susam 3y ago|1 comments
936.
How did the notation "ln" for "log base e" become so pervasive?(math.stackexchange.com)
3 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
937.
Byte Magazine Volume 1 Number 1 – Computers – The World's Greatest Toy (1975)(archive.org)
2 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
938.
Let's Compute – Issues 1 to 12 (1990-1991)(cpcwiki.eu)
32 points by susam 3y ago|3 comments
939.
Let's Compute – Issue 1 (1990) [pdf](archive.org)
2 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
940.
by susam 3y ago
Thanks again for the response and the suggestions. I have updated the documentation now to incorporate the suggestions: < https://github.com/susam/cfrs/commit/f6b591b >.
941.
by susam 3y ago
One of my pet peeves while reading technical documents is coming across acronyms that have not been introduced to the reader yet. When this happens over and over again across several documents of a project and people working on the project
942.
by susam 3y ago
About a decade or so ago, I found the way free and open source software was used in commercial projects seemed to better align with the warranty disclaimers of the open source licenses. For example, I remember in a C++ project I worked on
943.
Programming with DOS Debugger (2003)(susam.net)
107 points by susam 3y ago|47 comments
944.
You Don't Feel Jet-Lagged When You Run a Fever (2016)(hopkinsmedicine.org)
22 points by susam 3y ago|4 comments
945.
by susam 3y ago
Thank you for the kind words. Crafting these small tools is a creative outlet for me. To learn that you like these tools is both gratifying and inspiring. So thank you for leaving this comment.
946.
by susam 3y ago
Thanks for the bug report. This should be fixed now!
947.
by susam 3y ago
Thank you for playing with this tool and for sharing your feedback. Does "once" make the description of the block meaningfully different from "once more"? If so, I would like to understand this better. A repeatable blo
948.
by susam 3y ago
The actual colour may have been #950 or #951 which looks very similar to #951. Pulling the blue slider down by a notch or two could have got you a perfect match. Here is a demo of these colours if you want to see for yourself how similar th
949.
Show HN: Turtle graphics with only 6 commands: C, F, R, S, [, ](github.com)
2 points by susam 3y ago|6 comments
950.
Ensuring contrast ratio of at least 7:1 exists between text and background(w3.org)
2 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
951.
Common Lisp Logos(lisperati.com)
1 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
952.
Org+Pandoc Workflow(ismailefe.org)
2 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
953.
Good Blessings (2016)(susam.net)
1 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
954.
Advice regarding note-taking in Emacs(protesilaos.com)
3 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
955.
Trivial Infinite Loops Are Not Undefined Behavior(isocpp.org)
3 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
956.
Washington Mini Monument(atlasobscura.com)
1 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments
957.
by susam 3y ago
Great demo! Thanks for sharing! Copying the un-mangled code here for future reference: NNNN7[SDD*N1024/RDD*N1024/R+N4096<[RN1+RR]SDD*N1024/RDD*N1024/R+N4096<![PPN4000N4000]SDD*N1024/RDD*N1024/RS-XN1
958.
Show HN: FXYT – Tiny, esoteric, stack-based, postfix, canvas colouring language(github.com)
82 points by susam 3y ago|10 comments
959.
by susam 3y ago
You are right indeed. Looked at the specification again and indeed there is no back-reference in POSIX ERE. Quoting from < https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2008edition... >: > It was suggested t
960.
Trailing Dots in Domain Names(dns-sd.org)
2 points by susam 3y ago|0 comments

More ›