Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sureIy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
211.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
For posterity's sake, this is a "yo mama" joke
212.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
sghiassy is so fat that one week in the gym affects the national average
213.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
What is wrong with Ryanair exactly? Do they have too many customers and want to trim some out? All of these are just barriers to bookings and reasons to prefer other airlines. It's true that they don't have competitors on certain
214.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> The new Siri is awful. I don't know the old Siri very well, but it's just not good. Yeah, don't buy into Apple's marketing, Siri is still crap. The only interesting thing that it gained is that it will usually work
215.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
In my experience it's pretty bad at it. The replacements have really bad repeating patterns/textures that aren't even part of the image. 6-year-old Photoshop content-aware fill was so much better on 10-year-old hardware.
216.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
How is that related?
217.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Register_(sociolinguistics) Formal: "I would like to express my deepest gratitude for your invaluable assistance in this matter." Neutral: "Thank you so much for your help w
218.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> using the webextension polyfill What for? All browsers now have a promised API > The Firefox folks could really improve the UX here I wouldn't hold my breath.
219.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Yes but what is the point? You're asking to get fired or to be moved to the basement.
220.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> it is still JavaScript Yes, it's still one of the most performant languages around, so that's a good thing right?
221.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> the console tells me immediately and the exactly line to fix. Uh, yeah, that's a runtime error. Type safety tells you the error before you even hit save, let alone run and test. It's a wildly faster loop.
222.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
It would be a good project but you need people to review all code. I think effort/money could be spent on more pressing matters in this environment; open-source contribution is rather niche.
223.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Part of prison is that you can't communicate to the external world without being monitored. Any shared code would also have to be reviewed. Even in Norway internet use is banned, except for educational purposes, which presumably limi
224.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Wrong on so many levels. If you don't want to pay, then don't. Get an older phone or not the high end. The extra performance is used. Modern photography uses a ton of power, and recording even more so. Granted, I also think that
225.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
I think that will lose track of what you're really after if the function changes enough, or is moved to a different part of the file, or just moved out. Without tools that understand the code (e.g. AI) git alone can't keep track o
226.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Yeah, definitely do add those 2 extra properties to make your site look nice, but don't overwork the DOM just because the native CSS blur isn't perfect enough. Guaranteed 0.01% of people would even register this change. I'd
227.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> is an exaggeration for this effect I disagree. Check the changes required to the spacing/sizing. Soon you will need to adjust those values and that.is.maintenance. Multiply this by each detail and soon you have more work than yo
228.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
This is the sort of completely unnecessary details that eat hours of your time and add tons of code and maintenance for something that few-to-none notice. It's great to experiment, but don't use this in projects that you intend to
229.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Wait till someone files a CVE
230.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> most don't do much Directly, maybe, not. But people love games and wearables gamify fitness. I think that's a net positive. My mother looks at her Apple Watch step count daily.
231.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
> I'd put it at 2-4 months of undistracted skilled engineering time. How much is that worth to your company/customer vs a higher monthly bill for the next 5 years? As a consultancy company, you want to sell that. As a customer,
232.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Same here. I used it and set it up once and had no issues personally, but only after documenting how to deal with it exactly. It's just a rare feature so people don't know how to deal with it, so they just hate it. Once you figure
233.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Maximized by flat rate payer, minimized by pay-per-use. You want to maximize it, the hosting definitely prefers someone who pays and doesn't use, so they can double-book that server.
234.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
It's completely reasonable to exterminate an entire ants colony if 5 ants bite you , or at least that's their logic here, including the "ants" part. But of course we know the "self-defense" part is just a cove
235.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
It's crazy to me that anyone would still consider S3 after R2 was made available, given the egress fees. I regularly see people switching to R2 and saving thousands or hundreds of thousands by switching.
236.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Seems perfectly reasonable to me? If you are on /somepath I'd expect to get C as is the most specific value out of all three. All the values are still returned, ordered, which to me is the best of both worlds (path-specific values
237.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Irrelevant. Safe transfer should be the default. Your argument is akin to "I don't have anything to hide." You just do it and don't think about it. Modern servers and services make this completely transparent. The kebab
238.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Yeah that also stopped being a thing. I'm really happy how Chrome and then other browsers gradually shifted the blame to insecure websites rather than highlighting "secure" ones. You'll still find people online clamoring
239.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Absolutely not. Firefox has mindbogglingly bad performance with :has() even if their superficial tests tell you otherwise. I experienced minute-long lockups just because I used :has() on a large element like body. Chrome and Safari had no i
240.
▲
by
sureIy
2y ago
Yes, you definitely don't want to risk closing up all those holes discovered in the last 10 years, lots of people might be left out of your servers.
More ›