Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
supreme_loquat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4mo ago
For embouchure mechanics, I'd highly recommend Dave Wilken's blog. That was his doctoral research focus and he's got a good intro to brass embouchures on his blog [0]. The tongue is usually not as much of a focus when it come
2.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
> Only one person will win anyway, so disappointment about the outcome actually seems like the wrong focus vs eg satisfaction that you got to represent your preferences fairly. Except that approval voting doesn't allow you to expres
3.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
Ah when you mention parallelizing I was assuming you were referring to the issue of requiring that ballots all be centralized in order to tally them for IRV, rather than summing at each precinct individually. The data that has to be in a ce
4.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
The biggest issue with a proposal like this is that a lack of any preference given whatsoever should not count positively towards a candidate. If someone labels candidate A as +3, candidate B as -3, and doesn't label candidate C, can
5.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
It's pretty common to not release the full CVR unfortunately. It makes the process much less transparent and also makes it harder to study how the different voting methods work in the real world.
6.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
> You could have each precinct count the first round This is just centralized tallying with extra steps. You can't finish the first round without results from every precinct, that's the point. To finish the first round, you n
7.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
> On the other hand, ordinal systems have to be much more coordinated as they are not trivial to parallelize I don't think this is true for all ordinal systems is it? Wouldn't most condorcet methods simply be tallied into a hea
8.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
Congress is totally broken, large bills like this are consistently shoved through and members of congress aren't given the opportunity to even read them before it's voted on. What's worse is they vote to pass them not even kn
9.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
> No it does not necessarily mean that, it could plausibly mean that they do have a second preference, but are afraid of giving them points so that they don’t overtake their first preference. Think of a Bernie, Hillary, Trump election wh
10.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
You're just repeating the same points without engaging with anything I wrote. You're still making the assumption that the first choice votes are the most important, and ignoring the fact that people have other preferences that the
11.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
> it is a stepping stone to proportional representation (achieved by adopting both RCV and multi-member districts), which is much more important than which single-winner voting system is chosen There are proportional methods for STAR and
12.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
Beating everyone head to head is beating the field. The reason Begich wasn't picked by RCV is because he didn't have enough first choice votes. The problem with your analysis is that you are placing more value on a person's
13.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
4y ago
Yes, the cast vote record has been released, and Begich wins the head to head vs both Palin and Peltota. [1] is a nice writeup on the election (highly recommend the What's Interesting header if you don't have time for the whole th
14.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
5y ago
Not sure I'm convinced. They'd have to have their heads totally buried in the sand to not know it's a problem, and as the saying goes, it is difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends upon not
15.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
5y ago
I don't think I wrote that all democrats didn't want to fix this, it was simply an illustration that there are plenty of democrats that don't want to fix it or don't care enough to do so. You have to consider that CA cou
16.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
5y ago
I did actually touch on it briefly in [1] but it was not my only focus so perhaps you missed it. But I fully agree our voting system is one of the primary reasons for our polarization (social media is probably another but that's mainly
17.
▲
by
supreme_loquat
5y ago
> One side invaded the capital building in a violent attempt to overthrow democracy Okay so lumping together half the country in with a few extremists would probably be the first step to answering your question. Yes there were probably p