supersuryaansh

10 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by supersuryaansh 7mo ago

   Interesting project
2. 2.▲
   by supersuryaansh 10mo ago

   Yes you can use a container instead https://hub.docker.com/r/holesail/holesail
3. 3.▲
   by supersuryaansh 10mo ago

   Hey thanks for the feedback, I am rewriting the whole documentation at the moment to make it easier to understand and cover v2 of Holesail that we recently released. If you have a particular question about it, I am happy to help.
4. 4.▲
   Show HN: Holesail – open-source peer-to-peer tunnels(holesail.io)

   3 points by supersuryaansh 10mo ago|4 comments
5. 5.▲
   by supersuryaansh 10mo ago

   Thanks, let me know the feedback
6. 6.▲
   by supersuryaansh 10mo ago

   Yes it does, we have a Node API atm, but if someone wants to integrate directly as a Minecraft plugin then they would need to write Java bindings for Barejs.
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: Holesail – Share localhost over peer-to-peer, no port forwarding(holesail.io)

   1 points by supersuryaansh 10mo ago|6 comments
8. 8.▲
   by supersuryaansh 2y ago

   I have been developing with bare for a while now, normally our app takes 45 MB to run with Node but the same app runs 10 MB lower in Bare. For 10 instances of our app, it is easily 10x10 = 100 MB of saving with Bare.