Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sungx105
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
sungx105
8y ago
This article is about SpaceShipTwo, the successor version that was supposed to actually be able to carry passengers
2.
▲
by
sungx105
8y ago
I think it depends who reviews the complaints. Every single time I've responded, my complaint (which I always word calmly, non-aggressively, and politely) are met with the response that "2-day shipping only guarantees that the pa
3.
▲
by
sungx105
8y ago
I guess pared down to its absolute core, this is what Monte Carlo is - you just generate many a large ensemble of possible states. But this simplified explanation misses out on one key aspect of Monte Carlo: sometimes different kinds of Mon
4.
▲
by
sungx105
9y ago
MOFs are generally notoriously unstable in water. Would a scaled-up system be able to perform while maintaining functionality over many cycles?
5.
▲
by
sungx105
9y ago
My success rate over chat is 0%. I just get told over and over that 'Prime guarantees shipping, not delivery. So your package will be shipped within 2 days [or 1 day for 1-day] to the nearest Amazon distribution center. Usually this
6.
▲
by
sungx105
9y ago
Your option 1 is incomplete. It should read more closely to: You go to grad school and spend ~6 years working extremely long hours at nearly minimum wage with no benefits. You then spend 2-3 years on a postdoc still with relatively low co
7.
▲
by
sungx105
9y ago
Analysis being determined by a(n essentially) democratic vote is actually just replication of results. While the system is highly flawed now, I would argue that collaborating to build perfect experiments carried out by multiple labs would n
8.
▲
by
sungx105
13y ago
This would not be a realistic solution, because the time it can take to do experiments might be an extremely long time. This would make it so that everyone would be (at best) half as productive as before, since they would have to spend the
9.
▲
by
sungx105
13y ago
After reading the paper referenced in the article ( http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/09/20/1308825110.abst... ), I can only conclude that this is pretty cool work. The authors actually do point
10.
▲
by
sungx105
13y ago
But despite appearing primarily in popular culture as extremely small robots, nanotechnology simply refers to the scale of the technology, so actually, this is by definition, nanotechnology. It is actually the popular representation of nan
11.
▲
by
sungx105
14y ago
Definitely when it gets into quantum chemistry, the boundary between physics and chemistry breaks down. The problem, though, is not everything is like particle physics. Particle physics is able to be publicized as a field which will give u
12.
▲
by
sungx105
14y ago
Furthermore, the GFP example is easy to relate to - people have seen jellyfish before. But now imagine that same scenario but with something that people do not have familiarity with. Say I study the bonds between metal atoms and carbon ato