sungho_

7 ms·

31.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Those are just the cases of lacking Tool Intelligence
32.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Thank you sincerely for your thoughtful comment. Here are some of my points: > I lost the drive to endlessly customize my phone. The way to avoid that is to 'start at the maximum and gradually decrease'. I don't want to en
33.
by sungho_ 2y ago
> I really enjoyed how the post was laid out —- the structure caught and kept my attention and made the arguments easy to follow. Thank you. > Further, I think that it's easy to actually overwhelm yourself with too many tools, at
34.
by sungho_ 2y ago
This is what I think. I admit that the line between the main task and the tools is blurry, but usually the difficulty of the tools tends to be proportional to the difficulty of the main task. As you said, if it's a simple task done wit
35.
Overwhelm Yourself with as Many Tools as Possible (Why Not?)(sungho.blog)
11 points by sungho_ 2y ago|23 comments
36.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Don't you think that's impractical? All attempts to stop people from using the Internet to do things on their own have failed. If the creation of such images is considered a crime in itself, then it will be obscured. Therefore, tr
37.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Check this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40258051
38.
by sungho_ 2y ago
You seem to think that the only value of something is its practicality
39.
by sungho_ 2y ago
So among the topics in the article is one about fine controlling the cursor
40.
by sungho_ 2y ago
There's nothing in this article that isn't obvious and typical
41.
Maximizing Mouse (Not Keyboard) Potential(sungho.blog)
1 points by sungho_ 2y ago|4 comments
42.
by sungho_ 2y ago
I admit that my criteria for what I consider creative is vague. To explain it roughly, it means work that is not just modifying something that already exists. More specifically, when I say that LLMs can't do creative work, I mean that
43.
The Harsh Reality: LLMs (a.k.a. AI) Have No Creativity(sungho.blog)
3 points by sungho_ 2y ago|2 comments
44.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Improving LLM's hallucinations is not a theory, it's a reality right now. In fact, developers do it all the time. > the burden of proof is on you; skepticism is warranted. I can prove it. You can test it too, try it: after LLM&
45.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Treating hallucination as an error rather than a fundamental limitation is simply a practical way of thinking. It means that, depending on how it's handled, hallucination can be mitigated and improved upon. Conversely, if it's reg
46.
by sungho_ 2y ago
No advice has a 100% success rate. The existence of failure cases doesn't inherently make the advice bad. The advice to pursue your passion as a startup idea is still relatively good advice. It's the best way to avoid the most tri
47.
by sungho_ 2y ago
You are confusing words. In the context of the OP, "having many options" doesn't mean indiscriminately hoarding everything. It's like making choices in chess that result in having more options for moving pieces. The &quo
48.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Intuitively nonsensical but irrefutable thought: Everything about how animals think is based on human assumptions. They might actually like being eaten by humans. How can we know, when the animals haven't said it themselves? In fact, t
49.
Why Ordinary Blogs Usually Suck(sungho.blog)
4 points by sungho_ 2y ago|0 comments
50.
Two Types of Creativity(sungho.blog)
1 points by sungho_ 2y ago|0 comments
51.
Introduce Tool Intelligence(sungho.blog)
1 points by sungho_ 2y ago|0 comments
52.
by sungho_ 2y ago
But what about fixing the obvious, common, and annoying bugs in the web version? That doesn't count as an accomplishment?
53.
by sungho_ 2y ago
I think the point is about the images which will never be shared No one wonders why they shouldn't spread fake nude photos of real people
54.
by sungho_ 2y ago
I agree. But this is just out of curiosity, what about jobs that don't have repetitive tasks and don't feel like coding, after you've spent enough time on coding. For example, business manager.
55.
by sungho_ 2y ago
No, if I had to nitpick, I'd say 'talk is expensive'. The original text doesn't say "Somebody might even talk about how they want to do X" like your comment, and it doesn't need to. But maybe someone who f
56.
by sungho_ 2y ago
What about nuclear weapons, which have become so accessible that even small organizations can have them?
57.
by sungho_ 2y ago
Based on what you're saying, it seems like in the future people will only choose 1, not 2.
58.
by sungho_ 2y ago
That's yes difference that it's short time relief. And you're already caring about the problem now. In fact, it's even possible that you can be caring about that because you've had a Big Mac to reduce your stress. I
59.
by sungho_ 2y ago
When we talk about after scarcity, we're talking about an endlessly sharable amount of wealth. (Not in a technical sense, of course) Then the super-rich will start sharing their wealth, because if they don't, their competitors wil
60.
by sungho_ 2y ago
I'm guessing, but I think the parent comment was meant to imply that "solver of all problems that doesn't solve the problem of "people having nothing to do"" is a contradiction.

More ›