3 ms·
I think the point is about the images which will never be shared No one wonders why they shouldn't spread fake nude photos of real people
by sungho_ 2y ago
I think the point is about the images which will never be shared
No one wonders why they shouldn't spread fake nude photos of real people
- Grimblewald 2y agoand again, if they will never be shared, there is not much to worry about. We do need tools to persecute people who failed on the 'never be shared' front. Be it theft or otherwise, if others get the material from them, it doesn't matter, it should be treated as guilty of producing with intent to distribute. This is for two reasons, the first being this way people cannot hide behind the 'oopsie' defense.Second, if you made compromising material of others without consent, your duty of care is through the roof. If it leaks, you are at fault, no matter how hard you tried to prevent it. You never had to make that material. There was no reason to make it other than a selfish self-centered personal pursuits of a hedonistic nature, now if its victimless I don't care personally but the moment your selfish self-centered behavior hurts others, you are a danger to society.
- sungho_ 2y agoDon't you think that's impractical? All attempts to stop people from using the Internet to do things on their own have failed. If the creation of such images is considered a crime in itself, then it will be obscured. Therefore, treating dissemination as a crime is not only logical, but also practical. And when it comes to accidental leaks, even if the person who created the image didn't pay attention, the leak happens by somebody anyway. I think it would be more practical and lead a better result to punish those responsible for the leak itself