sukilot

74 ms·

871.
by sukilot 6y ago
How would you know? What would someone intentionally violating noncompete mention it to an employer?
872.
by sukilot 6y ago
It's Jonathan Rockway. He's not an Apple spy.
873.
by sukilot 6y ago
Contracts of adhesion are quit conscionable. They are explicitly encouraged (but regulated) by public policy. Imagine if adhesion contracts didn't exist and you had to to have your lawyers negotiate every grocery store purchase.
874.
by sukilot 6y ago
Is that a joke about Bezos's $81K salary?
875.
by sukilot 6y ago
The bank wants to sell you a loan. They aren't going to intentionally leave money on the table by intentionally ignoring what an RSU is
876.
by sukilot 6y ago
Why doesn't de Beers have an army of staff to buy those all up ?
877.
by sukilot 6y ago
Did you get a diamond? If so, How do you justify to yourself that a diamond is moral, ethical, or practical choice?
878.
by sukilot 6y ago
Half the population of any neighborhood is women. You don't need to speculate about this. Ask a few.
879.
by sukilot 6y ago
You should ask your married friends what a proposal is, and how ring shopping works, before you find yourself making an embarassing mistake.
880.
by sukilot 6y ago
Why would sellers and manufacturers agree to something only deBeers wants?
881.
by sukilot 6y ago
They are likely treating it like real estate and taking a temporary loss in order to prop up future value when the economy recovers.
882.
by sukilot 6y ago
How can an optional* non-functional luxury good be sold for more than it's worth? *Worth to your lady, not to you Economically, the diamond is a token of wastefulness that serves only to destroy value as part of the human mating ritual
883.
by sukilot 6y ago
And now they will get paid nothing for non labor.
884.
by sukilot 6y ago
It's interesting that people are downvoting (from their computers made from Blood Rare-Earth Minerals) you but no one is posting links to relief efforts they've donated to or paid taxes for. It's easy to martyr other people
885.
by sukilot 6y ago
Retail shopping had incredible inefficiencies and economies of scale that a personal chauffer doesn't have.
886.
by sukilot 6y ago
No, the market prefers price discrimination to flat fees.
887.
by sukilot 6y ago
Uber is one company. It doesn't have all the drivers on it. You can make an account book direct at a hotel chain like you book direct at Uber.
888.
by sukilot 6y ago
I'd bet 4:1 odds that Haskell supports optional arguments with partial application using something like typeclass magic.
889.
by sukilot 6y ago
Gaming PCs are standardized, in practice. People who have insufficient hardware don't play game X, or they upgrade.
890.
by sukilot 6y ago
The construction involves a rotation of an infnitely detailed object in a way which is analogous to Hilbert Hotel. (Rotating it makes it fill empty space) B-T is Hilbert Hotel plus Axiom of Choice.
891.
by sukilot 6y ago
It's controversial in the way addition is not. It's controversial as to which axioms should be the common default in the language, and where research funding should be spent.
892.
by sukilot 6y ago
> Maybe it's the french in my talking, That's a very April 1940 French perspective
893.
by sukilot 6y ago
Why does anyone stay in business in the EU? I wouldn't run a store if getting robbed earned me a fine.
894.
by sukilot 6y ago
Why do people care more about someone stealing a TV from a corporation than someone stealing $500M from taxpayers?
895.
by sukilot 6y ago
That's a complete myth.
896.
by sukilot 6y ago
The only function of national security is to preserve life, libery, and the pursuit of happines. it is not a goal in itself.
897.
by sukilot 6y ago
Yuan is a US citizen billionaire.
898.
by sukilot 6y ago
It has no real world implication because it relies on infinitely detailed objects. No real world approximation will shares its properties.
899.
by sukilot 6y ago
That's because almost all transcendentals are not computable or nameable, whereas all algebraics are. So when you limit to the space of nameable computable numbers you get a different statistical intuition.
900.
by sukilot 6y ago
Almost none of pure mathematics is like that. But the normies obsess over the pathological cases, often because they are described in misleading mathematically incorrect terms (such as Banach Tarski). It's kind of similar to law, where

More ›