sukilot

26 ms·

271.
by sukilot 6y ago
Interesting. Now that this info is published, Search Engines can use it to downrank all this organized SEO manipulation.
272.
by sukilot 6y ago
That's very misleading. Congresspeople have high approval from their own constituents. Everyone hates other district's congresspeople. https://news.gallup.com/poll/162362/americans-down-congress-...
273.
by sukilot 6y ago
> There isn't a legal process of banning TikTok. > Of course there is presidential executive power to do that These contradict each other.
274.
by sukilot 6y ago
You don't need AGNB to tell you Ticket Carlsen is a lying demagogue. Everyone who isn't a fan sees that when they watch Tucker Carlsen himself -- his lies aren't exactly subtle.
275.
by sukilot 6y ago
The reason people say "propaganda" is that your commentary uses a bunch of words but don't make an argument but sort of feel like they do, and because they reveal intellectually dishonesty when the surface is scratched. Imper
276.
by sukilot 6y ago
I doubt it was invented in the 1980s PT Barnum was doing it 100 years ago.
277.
by sukilot 6y ago
Why is it troubling for Andrew to give his opinion? Is it troubling when you post your opinion on HN? Or only troubling when people you disagree with share their opinion?
278.
by sukilot 6y ago
What is "journalist purpose"? Journaling weirdos is still journalism. It's just important to realize that are rare people on the fringe, not the mainstream personalities.
279.
by sukilot 6y ago
Is it good to have a show where the guest can lie about whatever they want unchallenged? That just selects for good bullshitters. Fox's Wallace and Axios's Jonathan had great Trump interviews where Trump where they let him drive h
280.
by sukilot 6y ago
This is called "both sides ism" where you give equal time to the sane view and the insane fringe view and call it "fairness"
281.
by sukilot 6y ago
But he is inviting the reader to form an impression, and doing so in an intentionally misleading way of selecting his subjects.
282.
by sukilot 6y ago
People outside the Midwest have more interesting nearby places to visit
283.
by sukilot 6y ago
Not just "aliens". Also experimental aviation and weapons projects.
284.
by sukilot 6y ago
Completely normal people would never go to Disneyland, a gigantic fake mountain in California. Ever.
285.
by sukilot 6y ago
That's quite provincial. Normal people have little adventures, but not all the same adventures.
286.
by sukilot 6y ago
I worry for people who don't understand that AGNB is designed around the concept of people showing off for the camera.
287.
by sukilot 6y ago
You skipped the big point where Amazon makes no promise that you will receive your purchase from the seller you bought from, if you FBA.
288.
by sukilot 6y ago
"rationality" is about how your reason about your goals. Goals themselves cannot be rational or irrational, even if they are in conflict.
289.
by sukilot 6y ago
The author of this article appears to be a philosopher specializing in philisophy and ethics of University culutre. It's easy to see why a Provost might want him gone. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Frodema
290.
by sukilot 6y ago
The US disagrees too, except for the certain brand of feminism that has taken over universities and partial taken over corporations.
291.
by sukilot 6y ago
What industry relies on a recommendation from a Masters degree advisor of someone who has a PhD from a different University? And even if that's true, the problem is the discrimination practiced by the employer, not the advisor. In corp
292.
by sukilot 6y ago
Title IX is a specific law. Recent trends in Left wing / feminist thought and behavior have some interaction with that, but only in the sense that they interact with everything in the University.
293.
by sukilot 6y ago
An employee violating University policy and violating the University's tenure contract is not "the University exercising its rights".
294.
by sukilot 6y ago
How is difficult to argue that a former student isn't a student?
295.
by sukilot 6y ago
"It's even worse elsewhere" is no justification for injustice. That's horrific. There's no "subordinate" here. The person he dated 12 years ago isn't a member of the institution and wasn't during
296.
by sukilot 6y ago
It doesn't make sense when any data is assumed to be proof of guilt without any evidence.
297.
by sukilot 6y ago
Title IX / DOE is a misdirection. This was driven completely internally by Uni administration, with Title IX only mentioned as the excuse. There was never a Federal complaint.
298.
by sukilot 6y ago
Then point is that punishing powerless innocent people doesn't solve the problem of guilty powerful people.
299.
by sukilot 6y ago
That certainly was true, but #metoo overturned that.
300.
by sukilot 6y ago
The whole OP was about how Title IX didn't ruin the career, but the Provost did anyway.

More ›