Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
strcat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
No, it doesn't resemble that at all.
92.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
A subset of their future devices will meet all of the official requirements for GrapheneOS and provide official support for using it. They may sell devices with it but that would be a separate announcement.
93.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
The secure element can be on the same CPU die as Apple does with the SEP but a device with only TrustZone wouldn't meet the requirements. It also needs to be a high quality implementation providing the expected features.
94.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
If you're in Europe you can use Curve Pay, PayPal and multiple banks which haven't moved to Google Pay. Alternatively, pay in cash if you want privacy.
95.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
You're correct. Dmytro Mukhomor is the lead developer of GrapheneOS.
96.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
The directors of the the GrapheneOS Foundation and the other things you're talking about are public information. I stepped down as lead developer due to relentless harassment preventing me from being productive. The same people targeti
97.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
The directors of the the GrapheneOS Foundation and the other things you're talking about are public information. I stepped down as lead developer due to relentless harassment preventing me from being productive. The same people targeti
98.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
Bear in mind it will solely be future devices which are supported. They're being developed and aren't launched yet.
99.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
Contactless payments already work on GrapheneOS via Curve Pay, PayPal and the apps of many European banks. Solving the duopoly between Apple and Google for smartphone tap-to-pay in the US isn't something GrapheneOS can do. Regulators &
100.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
> I'm calling out Graphene for dealing with a Chinese-owned company instead of US or Euro-owned vendor. There is a difference between manufacturing parts and components in China, and the entire design/development, production, a
101.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
No, you're mixing up entirely different companies. GrapheneOS is working with the Lenovo subsidiary.
102.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
You're mixing up 2 different companies descended from the original Motorola. Motorola Solutions is an entirely different company from Motorola Mobility with different owners. GrapheneOS is working with the company owned by Lenovo.
103.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
You're mixing up 2 different companies descended from the original Motorola. Motorola Solutions is an entirely different company from Motorola Mobility with different owners. GrapheneOS is working with the company owned by Lenovo.
104.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
Motorola Signature (2026) and Motorola Razr Fold (2026) are ranked one above the Pixel 10 Pro XL on https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/ . It's 2027 and later devices which are relevant though.
105.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
> how safe is Chinese Lenovo with closed sourced firmware? iPhones and Pixels are manufactured in China. Anything we could support is realistically going to be made in China right now. It's planned for GrapheneOS to have access to t
106.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
GrapheneOS is a separate thing from their own operating systems.
107.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
Motorola has committed to 7 years of support for the 2026 variants of the devices which will provide GrapheneOS support in 2027. There's still a lot of work to do in order to meet the GrapheneOS hardware requirements and there isn'
108.
▲
by
strcat
7mo ago
Fairphone is much further from meeting the requirements and have made it clear they're uninterested in providing proper updates or strong security. There will repeated official statements from the GrapheneOS project of Fairphone not be
109.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It's your claims which are extraordinarily and have been thoroughly debunked. You're directly engaging in bullying with baseless personal attacks. You make false accusation
110.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
Protecting strong privacy conflicts with the kind of hooking features unable to actually protect privacy without being easily bypassed. The reason apps would ban doing that is due to compromising the privacy and security model for applicati
111.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
GrapheneOS has a lot planned for Vanadium. It could become a project almost as large as the core OS project. We're going to be greatly expanding our team and that needs to happen before Vanadium can have substantially more changes than
112.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> Tor Browser seems to be a project that requires multiple full time developers. I don't think GrapheneOS have the resources right now to do this alongside their OS development, device support and app overhaul plans. We're in t
113.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
GrapheneOS does focus on browser fingerprinting with a long term approach that's being implemented. That's why adblocking is implemented the way that it is with a specific list of filters and then regional/language filters ac
114.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> The proof is in the pudding at the end of the day, how many privacy scandals Debian had vs how many privacy scandals Android had? One model seems to clearly work better than the other. Talk is cheap, I like to see the results. You'
115.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> I trust my Linux distribution because there's a chain of trust, from the maintainers, the contributors down to the user to make sure that the software is respecting the user. Nope, that's not actually how it works. In reality
116.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> The (desktop) Linux security model is different. Desktop Linux distributions lack a viable privacy and security model for applications and far more. They don't have comparable protections against exploitation or comparable privacy
117.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
GrapheneOS strongly recommends against F-Droid because it has major security deficiencies and adds an unnecessary middleman. Our recommendation is using developer builds of apps. F-Droid doesn't review the code for app updates but rath
118.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
Our OEM partner is announcing the partnership in March 2026. It's an active partnership with work under way for devices launching in 2027.
119.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
> Something similar was addressed some years ago as a feature request for GrapheneOS https://github.com/GrapheneOS/os-issue-tracker/issues/284 . To summarise there was no way to do this without an unaccepta
120.
▲
by
strcat
8mo ago
GrapheneOS provides greatly improved privacy including through features like Contact Scopes and Storage Scopes. > GrapheneOS does not have an equivalent of ublock origin built into the OS which I'd consider step 1 of fighting the pr
More ›