strcat

12 ms·

61.
by strcat 7mo ago
GrapheneOS has an OEM partnership with Motorola where they're working on improving their devices to meet our requirements because we won't lower our standards for updates and security features. A lot of work needs to be done for e
62.
by strcat 7mo ago
There's a standard Mock Location feature in Android usable for it. We're making a better per-app Location Scopes feature as a replacement. Mock Location is global which has bad usability.
63.
by strcat 7mo ago
There's a standard Mock Location feature in Android usable for it. We're making a better per-app Location Scopes feature as a replacement. Mock Location is global which has bad usability.
64.
by strcat 7mo ago
There's a standard Mock Location feature in Android usable for it. We're making a better per-app Location Scopes feature as a replacement. Mock Location is global which has bad usability.
65.
by strcat 7mo ago
There's a standard Mock Location feature in Android usable for it. We're making a better per-app Location Scopes feature as a replacement. Mock Location is global which has bad usability.
66.
by strcat 7mo ago
There's a standard Mock Location feature in Android usable for it. We're making a better per-app Location Scopes feature as a replacement. Mock Location is global which has bad usability.
67.
by strcat 7mo ago
The patch level they set in the operating system is consistently inaccurate. They raise the patch level based on applying a subset of the AOSP patches without the full set of patches including being missing kernel, driver and firmware patch
68.
by strcat 7mo ago
> Quite clearly privacy is important It's seriously lacking. There's little work on it. Applications are largely fully trusted with lack of a modern permission model. > none of the major components leak/store unnecessar
69.
by strcat 7mo ago
Foxconn is more involved than that and are clearly a highly trusted party. iPhones also contain components designed in China.
70.
by strcat 7mo ago
You can't expect much from people who think Kiwi Farms and content from members of the site are a reliable source of information.
71.
by strcat 7mo ago
I appreciate someone standing up to this. The particular account has been engaging in bullying towards me with endless lies since 2018. He posts personal attacks towards me in most threads about GrapheneOS. I don't understand why there
72.
by strcat 7mo ago
Yes, it's in good hands and the organization is actively being built out with the help of people from the Ethereum Foundation who know how to run a successful non-profit. We're making it into a serious organization and are hiring
73.
by strcat 7mo ago
Murena products aren't nearly as compatible with apps as GrapheneOS along with having poor privacy and atrocious security. Instead of improving privacy and security, they greatly reduce both. Instead of taking great care with the priva
74.
by strcat 7mo ago
Our project account posted a thread about our recent migration of our mail server to using our ASN and IP space. They replied to the thread by attacking Postfix, DNSSEC and DANE. They promoted the insecure MTA-STS approach promoted by Googl
75.
by strcat 7mo ago
> The community deserves a response to the question. You use GrapheneOS which we provide to you free of any cost but yet you're being nasty towards us throughout this thread. Why do you think you deserve anything from us? Why should
76.
by strcat 7mo ago
> When the project was primarily you, who was already known for technical prowess and a principled exit from a different project, that was enough for many enthusiasts. There was no principled exit from a project but rather from a company
77.
by strcat 7mo ago
The statement was put together collaboratively by our COO, community manager and moderation team which is the case with a lot of our written responses to journalists and others. People with their real name tied to GrapheneOS are targeted wi
78.
by strcat 7mo ago
I'm not anywhere close to the biggest contributor of code to GrapheneOS. Do you think the account listed as the committer is the one writing it? That's not the author of the code, it's the account used to approve it.
79.
by strcat 7mo ago
The ongoing lies, bullying and harassment towards me is very real and you're directly participating in it. The reality which can be found through looking through actual content which hasn't been doctored is that joemazerino has en
80.
by strcat 7mo ago
It's an outright fabrication with no basis. All you've done is posted a video filled with doctored content and fabricated claims from a serial harasser. Henry Fisher (Techlore) has been orchestrating harassment towards me for year
81.
by strcat 7mo ago
GrapheneOS has hardware-based virtualization on the Pixel 6 and later along with DisplayPort alternate mode on the Pixel 8 and later. It has the standard Android 16 QPR2 desktop mode and Terminal VM management app capable of running GUI app
82.
by strcat 7mo ago
Pixels will continue to be supported until end-of-life. We still intend to add support for future Pixels too. Google is welcome to work with us to make that smoother. > May I ask if you still recommend Windows to pair with Graphene? I ne
83.
by strcat 7mo ago
You can keep your old phone around for it but they should solve the problem. Motorola can likely help us with getting it resolved once things are further along.
84.
by strcat 7mo ago
GrapheneOS is a non-profit and it's not that kind of business partnership. We're getting a device with official GrapheneOS support out of it and they're getting increased device sales from having more secure devices with bett
85.
by strcat 7mo ago
Our official requirement is 5 years of support meeting our standards but it will be raised to 7 at some point. The Motorola Signature (2026) already has 7 years of support but it's future devices which are going to meet all our require
86.
by strcat 7mo ago
Motorola Signature (2026) has 7 years of support. It's a subset of Motorola's future devices in 2027 and later which are going to support GrapheneOS since the current ones in 2026 didn't quite meet all of the requirements yet
87.
by strcat 7mo ago
Motorola Signature (2026) has 7 years of support. It's a subset of Motorola's future devices in 2027 and later which are going to support GrapheneOS since the current ones in 2026 didn't quite meet all of the requirements yet
88.
by strcat 7mo ago
Motorola Signature (2026) has 7 years of support. It's a subset of Motorola's future devices in 2027 and later which are going to support GrapheneOS since the current ones in 2026 didn't quite meet all of the requirements yet
89.
by strcat 7mo ago
GrapheneOS will continue supporting Pixels.
90.
by strcat 7mo ago
That would be entirely up to Samsung. It's not likely.

More ›