straydusk

7 ms·

61.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Thanks for saying this.
62.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Uh... I have no idea why the chat isn't working! Looking now!
63.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I think the reverse Socratic method when it comes to LLMs is one of the best constructs, period - both in this context, but in many.
64.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Shot you an email!
65.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I think you're right. I think that's why I like this approach - it's keeping you in the loop for most of it - and you just get documents as output that you can edit, check, and iterate on yourself.
66.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I found SpecKit to be over-engineered, and BMAD to be quite complex. To me, this was a "thin" enough solution that I still felt like I was in control, and not at the mercy of an additional abstraction.
67.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I mean, that is in large part what this is. I just turned it into an app because a) it was a lot of manual work for me and then b) this way other people can use it.
68.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Interesting, fair though. I think of my own ideas that way, but maybe not everyone does!
69.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I mean, it would be great if it wasn't necessary - but have you used these coding agents? They need it.
70.
by straydusk 11mo ago
I'm honestly not sure how you got the "turn your messy ideas" placeholder - how did you get to that?
71.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Thanks for the response! I have wired it up...it's using gpt-5-mini. I just have API-level usage limits - I figured if it hit those, I could worry about how to adjust costs, rate limit, etc. The jumping through steps is not intended -
72.
by straydusk 11mo ago
Maybe that's something I should add, to more clearly illustrate it. This tool is creating a spec that the AI coding agent of your choice can execute on, it's not an AI coding itself. Or maybe I'm not sure what you're get
73.
Show HN: I built a wizard to turn ideas into AI coding agent-ready specs(vibescaffold.dev)
71 points by straydusk 11mo ago|37 comments
74.
by straydusk 11mo ago
> digital space is the only place left where children can grow up without us What an observation. I agree with this.
75.
by straydusk 11mo ago
> I disagree on some of that, but it's your call. This sucks. I can't believe they used this as an example to follow. "I think it's bad, but I'm not going to tell you why, I'm just going to say that and then
76.
by straydusk 11mo ago
What kind of innane logic are you using here?! Yes, if the systems are installed for a reason approved by the public, and then they're used for a different reason, people don't like that.
77.
by straydusk 1y ago
You're not describing a CTO, then
78.
by straydusk 1y ago
Comparing this to blockchain and Web3 is fucking hilarious. Web3 literally has like no real use case, LLM tech has a billion. It literally passes the Turing test.
79.
by straydusk 1y ago
I'll tell you what, I was interested in this place, but this would stop me in my tracks. For an A/B testing shop to do this (which I can promise you they did not A/B test), it pretty much invalidates everything they supposedl
80.
by straydusk 1y ago
> Most parents just watch TV, stare at their phones and don't want to be bothered by anything that requires effort. What universe do you live in
81.
by straydusk 1y ago
Share an example then
82.
by straydusk 1y ago
Jesus Christ Reuters is left-leaning lmao in what universe
83.
by straydusk 1y ago
Then give an example
84.
by straydusk 2y ago
The idea that Trump had a goal as sophisticated as that is just hilarious.
85.
by straydusk 2y ago
Do you have kids?
86.
by straydusk 3y ago
> I get this wouldn't work as well for those with families Your whole post is a series of contradictions where you hand wave gigantic problems and exaggerate small ones
87.
by straydusk 4y ago
This is very incorrect. I work at Indeed. The company from the leadership on down has talked & moved for years towards better aligning what we deliver & what we charge money for with what our customers want (hires). You seem to have