Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stouset
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
721.
▲
by
stouset
1y ago
As an American, is that the generally-accepted viewpoint now? That Brexit was a mistake? If so, do people feel like it was an honest mistake, or do people generally believe that the politicians and businesspeople who supported it were eithe
722.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Yeah, sorry, I didn’t mean to necessarily single you out. I just hear the argument that the constitution gives both illegal and legal residents that right and conservatives simply respond that illegals shouldn’t have rights and that’s that.
723.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
I wish people would stop trying to argue that the constitution affords due process to both legal and illegal residents like you are doing here. It does , but that’s missing the forest for the trees. If all the government has to do is say “
724.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Many of the people currently being stripped of their rights and deported are documented, legal visa and green card holders or documented and legal asylum seekers. Even illegal immigrants need to be deported through due process. That’s the
725.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Secession.
726.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Which people in the woke movement had power, and what were some of the woke policies that they enacted? Every time I go down this line, it’s all vague boogeymen or claims of events that don’t hold up to scrutiny.
727.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Hmm… where have I seen this strategy play out in recent memory?
728.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Do you have a link to where I could learn more about this?
729.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
It’s less about actions we could take and more about knowing we don’t have to worry about colliding with a star for the moment.
730.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
I think the concern is that if a star was headed in our direction we’d see it coming. We don’t see one, so we know there is no anticipated threat. A small, lone black hole could be on an intersecting trajectory with us within a few years an
731.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
If we're going out of our way to eliminate things that cause zero perceptual experience I don't see why you would exclude them.
732.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
I think the point is that even saying the "experience" of being free of RF implies a perception which does not exist. Plus it's well-known that you don't really get the full experience of this unless you manage to shie
733.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
This is an observed change of going from 1 core at 100% to 64 cores at 100%. This is establishing a lower bound, assuming there is no wasted work or contention for shared resources.
734.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
We have, it’s just yet another counterexample that tanks the arguments of True Believers.
735.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
The entire point of cryptocurrency contracts is supposedly that “code is law”. Running to the courts as soon as someone does something you didn’t intend only highlights that people don’t actually believe this.
736.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
This is ridiculous. The standard isn’t “are they unbiased” because it is utterly unachievable. You know this and you cling to it anyway. What matters is whether their bias materially influenced their conclusions . They have provided analys
737.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
What, exactly, were you hoping to learn by accusing Airparif and the EU of bias? All this time I’ve been asking questions of you, hoping to learn about your thought process: Who should be performing these measurements? Who should be funding
738.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Prosecute, not persecute :)
739.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Your refusal to give any example of any work that meets your threshold only serves to underscore my point.
740.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Right, right, you never said you disagreed. You’re “just asking questions”. The messenger matters less than the data, the collection methods, and the approach to analysis. Bias can be a reason to more carefully examine a conclusion and th
741.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
> However, I no longer accept published reports at face value, unless I check who the authors are, and who funds them. No, you use this as a cop out to deny results. In this case you have done this check and you have decided you do not w
742.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
If you don’t think the current people doing this work or funding it are appropriate, you should be able to give at least a vague idea of an entity you think is better suited for either. The only qualification you managed to put out there
743.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Who, exactly, should be funding air quality measurements within the European Union?
744.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
This isn’t critical thinking. Your complete inability to even vaguely hint or suggest at someone who might be better equipped to either perform this analysis or fund it makes that clear. “Someone without bias” is a cop out. Everyone has bia
745.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Who, exactly, would you like to monitor air quality and who, exactly, do you think should be funding it?
746.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
It’s also worth considering that at most you’d be automating 24 jobs.
747.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
> billions off regular people who had margin calls Thanks, Robinhood!
748.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
I’ll play devil’s advocate. Following Ben’s videos and building the 8-bit CPU is the first thing that ever helped me “get” electronics and circuitry. Honestly, way more than half of the fun has been in finding the design flaws and designing
749.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Dingdingding Since none of those assumptions are specified, you have no idea which of them will inexplicably change during a bugfix. You wanted that in cornflower blue instead, but now none of your settings are persisted in the backend. So
750.
▲
by
stouset
2y ago
Your boss can know about it, but if their boss wants data on performance you’re back in the same boat. Funny you mention engineers needing to market themselves though. That leads to its own consequences. I’ve been at a place where everyone
More ›