4 ms·
I think the point is that even saying the "experience" of being free of RF implies a perception which does not exist. Plus it's well-known that you don't reall
by stouset 2y ago
I think the point is that even saying the "experience" of being free of RF implies a perception which does not exist.
Plus it's well-known that you don't really get the full experience of this unless you manage to shield yourself from neutrinos by surrounding yourself with sufficiently-dense proto-neutron stars.
- cf100clunk 2y agoNeutrinos, cosmic rays, and extraterrestrial subatomic particle streams are not considered RF, right?
- stouset 2y agoIf we're going out of our way to eliminate things that cause zero perceptual experience I don't see why you would exclude them.
- cf100clunk 2y agoThose requirements were not specified, so were not designed or built. If you can increase the budget, we can write-up a proposal to wrangle some sufficiently-dense proto-neutron stars.