storminabucket

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by storminabucket 6y ago

   And even if there were, you could be subsidizing Mozilla, because they can simply give Firefox less now that you're supporting it
2. 2.▲
   by storminabucket 6y ago

   It's just that "it depends" is not very satisfactory, it's the default answer to all questions. All questions are fractal in nature, and unsolvable without a problem-domain. By defining the domain a thing can be answered
3. 3.▲
   by storminabucket 6y ago

   I think it is in our nature to strive for more. An interesting read about this phenomenon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill We aren't made to be happy, only motivated
4. 4.▲
   by storminabucket 6y ago

   I'd argue the desire for consumer goods is very much equal for men and women, and is not inherently a bad thing. Some people are content when they have _things_, others seek thrill and experiences. Getting drunk on power is a trip wort
5. 5.▲
   by storminabucket 6y ago

   I'm confused, the article seems to be actually asking the question. "It varies" is brought up multiple times, but that doesen't exactly help outlining how we would be able to define minimally good life. It also asks whet