stoicy

4 ms·

1.
by stoicy 12y ago
Should I get cancer I would instantly take today's cancer treatments and not rely on diet. After all, if I do get cancer and it is a metabolic disease affected by diet, then my idea of the correct diet is wrong by definition. I wouldn&
2.
by stoicy 12y ago
You and I probably disagree on what is a "perfectly healthy diet". But I fully agree with you that whatever the diet, it does not give exactly 100 % immunity for cancer. There are a minority of cancer types that seem to have quite
3.
by stoicy 12y ago
Yes I know it sounds absurd. That just happens to be the topic of the article we're commenting on here. It's also the topic of the book Tripping Over the Truth: The Metabolic Theory of Cancer by Travis Christofferson. I'm not
4.
by stoicy 12y ago
I don't think so and I didn't say so above. I hope you read my text, not only the first sentence of it.
5.
by stoicy 12y ago
I don't have any authority to comment what they mean in this particular article, but I have studied the issue quite a bit. So I give you my own world view, whatever it's worth. To get a quick therapeutic effect of starvation, the
6.
by stoicy 12y ago
The "in < out" is as silly as saying that Bill Gates is rich because more money enters into his bank account than leaves from it. Both are tautologies and don't explain anything, and are not the root cause. It's alway
7.
by stoicy 12y ago
Aspirin indeed often has a blood-thinning effect. As such it may help reduce the risk of blood clots. That's the best case scenario, and even then it merely treats the symptoms, not the root cause of blood clots. Blood clots and cerebr