Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stnmtn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
211.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I loved the presentation of this
212.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Seems like if the referrer is hacker news the site responds with a very pleasing image to get around hacker news hug of death? Strange
213.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
But you can extend things so much easier inside of a browser tab (Greasemonkey, etc) than you can with a native app.
214.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I find this fascinating. Could you lay out what that feature did, generally?
215.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I think it's incredibly obvious that just about any tool that can used remotely will be orders of magnitude more effective and helpful than sticky notes.
216.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Seriously, if I own faceboook.com and I just set my title to Facebook, this would copy in my facebook password? Sounds really really bad!
217.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
That's a good point, I've lost count of the times I've hovered my mouse over that IFunctionParameters tooltip expecting a nested tooltip to appear with the actual types
218.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
What is the difference of this and doing an object paramater, similar to JS? createPizza({bacon: true, artichoke: true}); This has the same benefit you describe of being able to add parameters without altering any old call sites createPizza
219.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I don't find it too bad to do interface IFunctionParameters { userId: string; name: string; age: number; } const example = ({userId, name, age}: IFunctionParameters) => {...}
220.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
There are a couple of neat tips, like "echo-ing". This is when after someone says a sentence, you simply repeat back the last word(s) they said. "I went to the beach last weekend, read a great book!" "You read a gre
221.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
What about college?
222.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
You don't have to say how great of an engineer you are to say that you think coding interviews are terrible. And the person you're responding to also agrees they are terrible for qualified candidates.
223.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Honestly, stuff like this makes me wonder if there's some metric that judges the reviewers, such as "percent of interviews in which feedback is given". I've experienced this as my company recently implemented metrics for
224.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
"Here's a historically hard problem that we've had and experienced for decades if not centuries with multifaceted origins and no clear answer" HN: "Just use ML, seems pretty easy to me". I don't meant to d
225.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Yeah, that's extremely stupid. It seems like he was suing his employer for this, hopefully it went well: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/06/stop-firin... After the points I made, do y
226.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I think you're dodging my main message. Of course it's ok to be white, I said that very very clearly in my comment I think, right? The thing is, you have to see who is using and spreading that message. When it's alt-right peo
227.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
What were their points, and how do my points not address them? I very much responded, and I should be more clear than until a person is clearly alt-right, them using the OK symbol or pepe the frog is 100% fine and I wouldn't even think
228.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
It's totally okay to use the OK symbol and pepe the frog, etc. I should have made that more clear; there's no problem in any way whatsoever with them until you start to see a pattern of the person using them being alt-right or adj
229.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
No, it's easy and not "off the deep end at all" The OK symbol is completely ok. There's nothing wrong with it. There's a certain sect of internet cretins who use it to dogwhistle to each other. When someone uses the
230.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Do you think these percentages line up? What about the relative cost of a semester of college in 1970-80 vs today? Or the relative cost of housing?
231.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
When any phrase is used exclusively by alt-right groups as a way to dogwhistle and provoke, it makes sense to label it as something that alt-righters use. No one is seriously arguing that devoid on the context and who pushes that specific p
232.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I can sort of understand your poisiton if I squint hard enough... but what you're saying is that if apple came out as fully Anti-privacy and invasive like Google then you would be more okay with them than you are now. That's weird
233.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
What is a company that doesn't do obnoxious overhyping?
234.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
What is an example of a legitimate and rational disapproval of homosexuality?
235.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Something that I've thought about is that, yes you can be against the crazy in the GOP, but ultimately if you vote for them you are emboldening people like MTG and others who have spawned from the Trump Pool. I find it hard to imagine
236.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Does it worry you that you seem to be unable to engage with my arguments, and instead dodge them and spout out buzzwords and just virtue signal?
237.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Are you free to drive a car drunk? Are you free to shoot into a crowd with a gun? What do you mean by freedom? You live in a country that has laws that restrict your freedom already; this vague grasp that you make toward "freedom"
238.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
You can't deny that it's a style. Not all games are served by having photorealistic graphics, in fact many of the game that are most thought of as 'beautiful' don't have photorealism and instead choose to use style
239.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
Ha, I meant it in the opposite way, that it avoids making either mistake. Yes, it consumes a lot of resources, but it's success has proven that users don't mind this as much as commenters on hacker news seem to. And it's a pr
240.
▲
by
stnmtn
5y ago
I think Discord strikes the balance of your two mistakes well.
More ›