stitched2gethr

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   Claude Code Gets a Second Opinion from GPT-5(proxymock.io)

   4 points by stitched2gethr 1y ago|0 comments
2. 32.▲
   Speeding Up AI Coding Assistants Using Deterministic Feedback(proxymock.io)

   1 points by stitched2gethr 1y ago|0 comments
3. 33.▲
   Peeking Under the Hood of Cursor's API Calls(proxymock.io)

   2 points by stitched2gethr 1y ago|0 comments
4. 34.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   For those that want an easy button. Here ya go. ``` review () { if [[ -n $(git status -s) ]] then echo 'must start with clean tree!' return 1 fi git checkout prist
5. 35.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   I'll keep using markdown.
6. 36.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   This take rings true for me after admittedly only a couple of hours of use of gpt-5. I had an issue I had been working with Claude on but it was difficult to give it real-time feedback so it floundered. gpt-5 struggled in the same areas b
7. 37.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   Well me plus a $1200 / year subscription is still much cheaper than 2 of me.
8. 38.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   Well it's about time.
9. 39.▲
   by stitched2gethr 1y ago

   Maybe it's not.
10. 40.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    I made an OSS tool to help you cheat on your taxes, screw your business partner, or ensure your ex wife cannot see the children. Someone stole the source and is backed by a major VC firm. Is the thought different at all or exactly the same
11. 41.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    Yes, although when I'm wrong I rarely say "Oh, now I see. This is definitely it!"
12. 42.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    Why would you review agent generated code any differently than human generated code?
13. 43.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    It will very soon be the only way.
14. 44.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    I'll admit, hearing a robot swear is pretty damn entertaining.
15. 45.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    I feel you, but cost is a real thing.
16. 46.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    Been building proxymock (proxymock.io) a free CLI tool to make local apps feel connected to prod, or any other environment. Good for fast integration testing, mocking, driving load, etc. Critical feedback appreciated.
17. 47.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    I've been building proxymock, a CLI tool which automatically builds mocks and load tests from captured traffic. Feedback appreciated - https://proxymock.io/
18. 48.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    And yet some of the accepted changes still haven't taken affect.
19. 49.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    > @overload is a decorator from Python’s typing module that lets you define multiple signatures for the same function. I'll be honest, I've never understood this language feature (it exists in several languages). Can someone ho
20. 50.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    > It can do anything a human can do within a terminal. This.. isn't true.
21. 51.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    > subtle AI-written bugs slipped through unnoticed, and we (humans) increasingly found ourselves rubber-stamping PRs without deeply understanding the changes. I'm not even going to add to this.
22. 52.▲
    by stitched2gethr 1y ago

    If your CI/CD process was able to fully verify a fix then it would have stopped the bug from making it to production the first time around and the Jira ticket which was handed to multiple LLMs never would have existed.
23. 53.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    Probably because it has read the facts but has no idea how numbers actually work.
24. 54.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    Meh. I've been using 2.5 with Cline extensively and while it is better it's still an incremental improvement, not something revolutionary. The thing has a 1 million token context window but I can only get a few outputs before I ha
25. 55.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    I very much agree. I've been using Gemini 2.5 pro for coding and I've always given it a simple instruction. Never write comments. It will stop writing them for a time but it's nowhere near the 1M context window. Now maybe thi
26. 56.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    Remote work did a number on middle management. When many of them realized that if they aren't the strategic brain at the top, and they aren't individual contributers, and they can supervise butts in chais, then they aren't ac
27. 57.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    I think this misses the point. It seems like the author is saying we should move from imperative instructions to a declarative document that describes what the software should do. Imperative: - write a HTTP server that serves jokes - add a
28. 58.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    I guess this is an unpopular opinion given the existing comments, but I don't get it. They spent time and energy on this instead of writing features or fixing bugs and I don't think it matters at all. The only interaction I have w
29. 59.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    This seems more on the trivial side to me.
30. 60.▲
    by stitched2gethr 2y ago

    Yes, if the callee has reason to believe the caller isn't who they say they are. But this will never enter the mind of someone who's retirement age.