Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stinos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
481.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
We also found that bug-fixing commits by authors tended to be larger in size and scope, and address multiple issues Too bad I cannot see examples of what this actually entails - for us one commit which fixes several issues is a complete n
482.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Other than that, Thunderbird works great. I've used it for decades and still recommend it to others (mainly becauce I never invested in trying enough other cross-platform alternatives), but 'great' wouldn't be a word I
483.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Also nice to seperate social media/shopping/banking/... I'm not 100% sure it completely prevents social media company X from knowing which items you searched for or bought from Y, but at least it should be a lot harder.
484.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Or they just create their own version https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/draft-online-safe...
485.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Really curious: how and by which layer (ISP? email/chat providers?) does this get implemented practically, on the software level?
486.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
You do not mention methane at all, isn't that oversimplifying things?
487.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Depends, mainly because 'academia' is far too broad of a term. For starters not all professors teach the same amount of hours (don't know all rules across all universities but there might very well be professors who do not te
488.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Interesting; don't speak the language but the first video showa a plant, and then a root/stem, without a link bewteen the two (i.e. harvesting). And the second shows just the stem. So still could go both ways?
489.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
This seems to be 'mysterious' because of the writing skill of the author. While 'mysterious' is hard to quantify objectively, the thing is: it is not known for sure what it is yet widely available, sounds mysterious en
490.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
You're missing my point, sorry if that was not clear from my wording. It is indeed perfectly possible that you experienced e.g. Linux working flawless for you and had other OS 'fuck it up'. But just like OSX isn't with
491.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
My computer doesn't slow down, is lightning fast, and just works, year after year. Can say that about pretty much any OS, highly depending on what exactly it is you do with it, and if you happen to be lucky enough that you're t
492.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
I don't watch sport either, what's the point watching other practicing it, once you know a sport Depends on the sport: for sports with really technical goals (think climbing, skateboarding) just 'knowing' isn't th
493.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Can relate. My current partner was a colleague and we had to literally work cloesly together. Something about the smell of her sweat activated the right brain function because it made me want more, as in 'let's procreate right now
494.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
But I would love a shell with a sane language Doesn't everyone :) Piping typed objects instead of text (notably Powershell) solves quite some general bash issue, unfortunately Powershell isn't exactly a sane language.
495.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
While I agree that arrays are usually not the thing you want in bash, in the end to me this just feels a bit like having to adapt the job to the tool instead of being able to select the right tool for the job. Both of these principles have
496.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Please no. For me it's fun once, then it starts to get annoying and feels iditoic. I've grown to like my error messages as clear and unambiguous as possible (What is 'damn' going to do? Is it 'ok'? Is it '
497.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
After several...frustrating...hours of trying to talk them through things over the phone to get RDP working Having had similar problems (not just windows, RDP/VNC/you name it) to me this now sounds like 'wrong tool for the
498.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Having used such books, I don't think it is that simple. I mean you could make an app just like the books but it might not add any functionality and as such not be usable for the wide public. Thing is, the series your questions you sho
499.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
That could be one aspect, but I was actually talking about taking pictures of complete persons. Usually turns out you're a beetle, or a worm, or a butterfly :)
500.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
The local app here for native plants (Obsidentify) beats PlantNet for me, but I have the impression there might be some 'user experience' into play: I know enough about plants to know what the distinctive features are and I know e
501.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Try talking to BirdNet, it'll tell you species = homo sapiens. Most plant recognition apps will stil try to match a plant when feeding it pictures of humans.
502.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
in the way that it renders a person not less, but more susceptible to breakage from smaller stresses That should be can render I think, the author seems well aware that what happened about him isn't bound to happen to anyone.
503.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Can you explain why Apple's implementation is semi secure and others' implementations aren't? All of them have been bypassed at one point or another IIRC but that's probably not what you mean? (also: if it's semi
504.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Came here to mention this. I'm not exactly a connoisseur when it comes to classical music, but if there's one thing I like it is Liszt, and I haven't heard it like this before. I mean this bass reminds me of 'proper'
505.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
sanely steps through code without getting lost in a library maze I'm not completely sure what you mean here? Debugger not stepping into 3rd party code? The debugger cannot know what you consider to be a maze and what not: are you dev
506.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
The animation shows replacing 'raise ex' with 'raise' but just leaves the now unused ex in 'catch Exception as ex', and in one of the comments here there's a similar unused name ke in 'Keyerror as ke&
507.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
That's kind of why I said completely. Sort of, but to people not knowing anything about it it might sound as if it's impossible to do anything at all in vivo so I added some information about what is possible if you do not want
508.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
I mean, we can't really completely inspect a working brain to see what's happening. To get that level of inspection, we'd need to dig into the brain while it is functioning. Unfortunately, this kills the patient Leave out t
509.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
it just feels like often we don’t have a solid (falsifiable, etc) grasp of what’s actually happening, yet… It feels like that, because it is like that: there's probably way more which isn't known about the brain yet, than things
510.
▲
by
stinos
5y ago
Well, the post I was responding to actually said that they thought these OSS products were at least as good as comparable commercial offerings which, in the case of LibreOffice, is entirely untrue. I stand corrected, I did misread that.
More ›