stevemcgrath

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by stevemcgrath 8y ago

   Honestly the Open-NSFW filter did a really good job of catching the overwhelming majority of the issues. Also until LetsEncrypt became commonplace, Dofler was still discovering tons of applications that forwent even basic encryption. It w
2. 2.▲
   by stevemcgrath 8y ago

   Actually, it Dofler uses driftnet, ettercap, dsniff, tshark, ngrep, and PVS and wired them together into a web front-end. Driftnet was the component that made porn filtering very hard, as driftnet gives you no indication of WHERE the image
3. 3.▲
   by stevemcgrath 8y ago

   flesh-tone filtering algorithms sucked.
4. 4.▲
   by stevemcgrath 8y ago

   Before Yahoo's Open-NSFW data was released, skin tone analysis and assessing if the image contained a majority of color palettes that are generally considered to correlate to flesh tones. You'd be surprised to know that many of t
5. 5.▲
   by stevemcgrath 8y ago

   As the actual developer of the tool that was used, porn filtering was something that was added later on, after the porn became a problem. The issue is that trying to filter such things is often a losing game, as most conference NOC staff d