Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stetrain
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
The positive viewpoint is basically like the Industrial Revolution or the post-WWII consumer/convenience boom. If productivity can increase significantly per worker, the result will be major overall economic growth. It might be sold to
32.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
Sure, so the economic anxiety from people with careers in the horse and cart industry was fully justified.
33.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
> Rich people are stealing all the jobs. The AI promoters are themselves saying these things because it is the positive case for their business, that other businesses can pay them for AI services that are cheaper and better than keeping
34.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
The current market cap of SPCX and TSLA combined (~$3.8T) is about 3 times the total value of all BTC (~$1.3T).
35.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
You can't shift productivity by 10X and expect the rest of the supply/demand equilibrium to stay the same, with you working 10% of the time and sipping drinks on the beach while retaining the same job opportunities and expected sa
36.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
And some foods are a lot more water efficient than others to produce.
37.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
> it's "when," not "if." That has always been the question since Elon started making self-driving claims back in 2016. If you believed him any time up until now you'd have been wrong and potentially own a ca
38.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
Tesla's own expectation six years ago was that they would be selling 20 million cars annually by 2030: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-... Tesla's recent annual car sales: 202
39.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
We have already reached the point where solar and wind produce new MW of power cheaper than any other power source you can build. Of course that energy generation comes with the caveat of being variable with sun and wind. It can still be a
40.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
A big question about this push for AI/LLM features in products, and I think very related to public sentiment on AI, is that if these features were so desirable and useful why do they need to be so forcefully promoted? If these features
41.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
ARM Windows laptops are a pretty different scenario now than when the Surface came out. They have pretty seamless x86/64 emulation built in similar to when Apple started their Mac transition to ARM. In contrast the OG ARM Surface didn&
42.
▲
by
stetrain
4mo ago
They've discovered that it's more efficient if the money flows directly from the private enterprise to the politicians without going through tax revenue.
43.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
There will be no single moment when that happens. It will be a stack of years and years of innovations and improvements each of which take time to roll out into mass production, start expensive, and get cheaper.
44.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
Well except that there were incidents of cars getting stuck in floods with passengers before they paused the service. A closer analogy would be ""Chicago O'Hare pauses flight departures due to a winter storm after 3 planes sl
45.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
Unless you're betting that a thing he has said will happen will actually happen when he said it would. Or even 10 years later.
46.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
We don't like LLMs throwing giant walls of code in PRs at repos and expecting devs to read and respond to all of them. That's kind of similar to written content being posted and linked. There's an expectation that you are ask
47.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
They're all over the place in Mexico City. It'll be interesting as these EVs start to show up along the northern and southern borders traveling within the US.
48.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
Well currently commenting on PRs isn't working. I'd say we notice this kind of issue once every few weeks or so. It's not the end of the world but also not great for a service that we pay for and which used to be more reliabl
49.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
As far as I know there's nothing preventing third parties from building and selling hardware with SteamOS or a similar software stack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SteamOS They aren't going to let you advert
50.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
In this case, the issues under dispute are the cases where the trademark was used outside of the GPL-covered code. Specifically the port author using the Notepad++ name and logo on their website, in addition to the photo and bio of the orig
51.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
You're having a hard time seeing the side where one side has a trademark on the project name and logo, and the other side is using those without permission?
52.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
'Kapybara Space Program' has actually already been done as an April Fool's post by the previous studio that worked on Kerbal Space Program 2: https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/topic/216143-kapybara-s..
53.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
You're absolutely right!
54.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
Not sure "sitting out" is the right way to put it. They've been publicly trying to ship a next-gen Siri for years and haven't been able to get something good enough to release. The latest plan is to base it on Gemini so
55.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
To some extent yes. Your output at work is based on a combination of inputs from others in your organization, and is being paid for by your employer, so the organization owns the copyright on what you make for them. I think from this view i
56.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
They could add rollover balances and be back to cell phone plans in the early 2000s.
57.
▲
by
stetrain
5mo ago
When a company packages this tool up and makes it part of their product they are taking some of that responsibility. The end user isn't supposed to need to know what an LLM is or how it works, that's what they're paying Canva
58.
▲
by
stetrain
6mo ago
I don't know whether the newer electrically-releasing battery adhesives would count, but they do allow cleanly removing and replacing the battery without proprietary tools.
59.
▲
by
stetrain
6mo ago
Reading some articles about the EU law, which is more complicated than the seemingly popular interpretation that all phones are now going to have tool-free battery doors on the back like it's 2005 again.
60.
▲
by
stetrain
6mo ago
As far as I know it should be pretty easy for Apple to comply with the regulation. The battery needs to be replaceable with standard or freely available tools and without adhesives. Many of Apple’s devices already meet this standard. Edit:
More ›