In this case, the issues under dispute are the cases where the trademark was used outside of the GPL-covered code. Specifically the port author using the Notep

In this case, the issues under dispute are the cases where the trademark was used outside of the GPL-covered code. Specifically the port author using the Notepad++ name and logo on their website, in addition to the photo and bio of the original Notepad++ author, in a way that could mislead others to think that this was part of the original Notepad++ project. A post with screenshots is here: https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/npp-trademark-infringement/ https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/npp-trademark-infringemen... Hosting a copy of the GPL'd Linux code, represented as such, and making a website claiming to represent Linux or the Linux Foundation with Linus's face and name on it are different things.