stephanfeb

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by stephanfeb 5y ago

   Dude, you seem to have some personal beef with someone. In my above response to truth_machine I laid out a technical response on why I hold my point of view regarding the Turing Equivalence of Bitcoin. I suggest you stick to the tech (like
2. 2.▲
   by stephanfeb 5y ago

   I disagree with your stated claim on (6) which is that there is no accepting state for (M) after an arbitrary move in (5). E.g. In bitcoin script any encounter with OP_RETURN moves you immediately into an accepting state whereupon the progr
3. 3.▲
   by stephanfeb 5y ago

   I disagree with @roconnor's assessment in the link provided. Just like that, I've "discredited" @roconnor. Folks are now free to reference this link in future posts as a claim that @roconnor's post has been discredi
4. 4.▲
   by stephanfeb 5y ago

   Where looping is concerned, you can either externalise the cost of looping by requiring some other entity with more resources to perform your computation for you, or you can pay upfront and commit satoshis to your computation. Regardless, y
5. 5.▲
   Show HN: Enterprise Report Server (aGPL)

   3 points by stephanfeb 13y ago|0 comments
6. 6.▲
   HTML5/SVG Manual Maker(setupmanual.com)

   1 points by stephanfeb 14y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: My Documentation Startup(setupmanual.com)

   2 points by stephanfeb 15y ago|0 comments