staltz

19 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by staltz 12y ago

   Thanks! That's a good idea. Actually the plan is to integrate rxmarbles into http://reactivex.io , see this https://github.com/ReactiveX/reactivex.github.io/issues/1#is... . So in the near futu
2. 182.▲
   Show HN: Interactive diagrams of Rx Observables(rxmarbles.com)

   19 points by staltz 12y ago|2 comments
3. 183.▲
   2 minute introduction to Rx(medium.com)

   6 points by staltz 12y ago|0 comments
4. 184.▲
   by staltz 12y ago

   Does it compile to Java source code?
5. 185.▲
   by staltz 12y ago

   Sure, you can do that. If it's not how you want it to be, just tweak it. http://jsfiddle.net/staltz/U2j4D/8/
6. 186.▲
   by staltz 12y ago

   Hi, can you make that question on the gist so that the discussion persists there? I'd be glad to try to fill in the missing mental bits there.
7. 187.▲
   by staltz 12y ago

   > There's something I'd like to understand: the article talks about FRP yet writes "(Functional) Reactive Programming" with "functional" between parentheses, why? This comment https://gist.github.
8. 188.▲
   An Introduction to Reactive Programming(gist.github.com)

   455 points by staltz 12y ago|119 comments
9. 189.▲
   Entrepreneurs need a Minimum Viable Mission(medium.com)

   2 points by staltz 13y ago|0 comments
10. 190.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Avatar is very complex and we were aware that many questions like these would come up. That's why we built a forum just for this purpose, where we can go through all these issues in detail. https://discussions.avatar.ai Th
11. 191.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    At first it's volunteer but we do realize that incentives are needed and we're working on different models. The long-term goal, which depends on WebRTC maturity, is to have no need for Bridges, because that code would be in the br
12. 192.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    We haven't released any source code yet because we first want to make sure our protocol designs are correct. Unhosted is a familiar project and we are currently evaluating multiple options to run unsecure code.
13. 193.▲
    Avatar: A browser OS with built-in privacy and anonymity(sneakpeek.avatar.ai)

    117 points by staltz 13y ago|48 comments
14. 194.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    I agree with everything, except: > What is Dropbox not doing that you are. I think the technical answer is that younited is aggregating your data across accounts such as Facebook, Dropbox, Picasa, etc. Dropbox doesn't do that, and i
15. 195.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    OP here. I pretty much enjoyed the whole journey up until now when it got unsustainable. Creative initial designs are really fun, but I have lots of fun also perfecting the system and seeing users coming in. It really "makes me happy&q
16. 196.▲
    Do whatever makes you happy is a lie(medium.com)

    49 points by staltz 13y ago|71 comments
17. 197.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Nice, an open source "Heroku". How about scaling of web processes? I couldn't in the docs about it.
18. 198.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    SEEKING WORK - Remote or Helsinki Full stack web developer, with 8 years experience in programming. I'm very creative and precise, but adaptable to whatever the situation is. Skills: Backend: Python, Django, Java, Node.js Frontend: LES
19. 199.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Hi, author here. I've been carefully considering flooding and hijacking of democratic forums since the idea popped into my mind in April 2012. We have solutions for it.
20. 200.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Author here. Nope :) and I admit he looks similar to me. I had alternatives, but this one was the best.
21. 201.▲
    It's time to abolish web monarchies(medium.com)

    5 points by staltz 13y ago|5 comments
22. 202.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Hi, Iroquote founder here. Yes, we're aware of Discourse (and some other 15 alternatives). To our knowledge, we are the only nextgen forum system doing something different: forums with no administrators/owners, democratically mode
23. 203.▲
    Using MongoDB as your primary Django database(staltz.github.io)

    1 points by staltz 13y ago|0 comments
24. 204.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Another one to add to that list: Iroquote ( http://www.iroquote.com ), by yours truly. Two really new things in our forum software: communities are democratic (no admin "owners") and discussions are summarized (no 20-page comments to read t
25. 205.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    None of these reasons sounded strong enough to justify your leave. I would favor long-term goals rather than short, as a CEO. Unhealthy eating habits is your problem, not your employer's. It's awesome you get great food. Trust and flat hi
26. 206.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Thanks for the "wisdom" but I've done my research already. There is no consensus on the web that threaded is hands down the best way to do it. Some prefer flat some prefer threaded. I'm just building flat++, fixing the worst problems. There
27. 207.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    If I'm dead wrong, explain me how Branch.com is being successful as a "good web conversations platform" with a single thread layout. Plus, explain me their decision to make Branch "better and simpler" ( http://bulletin.branch.com/ ) by rem
28. 208.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Giant quote pyramids are a big mistake of old forum systems. But imagine quoting without quotes-in-quotes. Combine that with "click on quote" to see the post. BTW, HN also breaks chronology.
29. 209.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    You're free to disagree, as I disagreed with you. A few more defenses to my opinion: single threaded conversations can be saved from annoying idiots through a highlighting feature. I'm talking Slashdot comments (which are threaded but what
30. 210.▲
    by staltz 13y ago

    Threaded comments are a bad thing. I've gone through this thoroughly in a blog post ( http://blog.iroquote.com/post/45908133231/5-reasons-why-thre... ), but here is an overview of why: 1. Screen width limits the depth of threaded replies.