stale2002

6 ms·

61.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Journalists are meant to report on the news. This sounds like an interesting piece of science/news to me.
62.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Counter protesting people who are destroying a community seems like a perfectly laudable goal to me. He certainly wasn't expecting to have to shoot someone, but that's the case for most examples of self defense.
63.
by stale2002 3mo ago
No it's not unintuitive. Just like I can learn from a book and nobody can make that illegal, so can other people transformative do the same with computers. Fair use is fair use.
64.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> So, why all this "effort" to protect the model? Because it's their model and business and they are free to use the free market to do exactly that? That's their free market rights too. If you don't like it, use
65.
by stale2002 3mo ago
If it was illegal to go somewhere "lookin for trouble" I think that you would see a whole lot of people arrested from certain groups that you likely wouldn't want to be in prison.
66.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Almost nobody is covered by non compete agreements. And if you think you are, you should just ignore it anyway. They are often both illegal and unenforced. Your old employer isn't going to waste time hiring a private detective to track
67.
by stale2002 4mo ago
Well it would be anyone that has access to a datacenter to run them. Which is a ton of companies. And those companies will rent out access to those models. And if they do something stupid to screw over consumers, well the whole point is
68.
by stale2002 4mo ago
I am sorry to be the one to tell you but it was already the case that you cannot trust LLMs to solve all your problems 100% of the time. It was always random. This is no different than any other randomness that already exists in LLMS. If yo
69.
by stale2002 4mo ago
Of course you can trust them. Just do benchmarks yourself on the new model and decide if it is valuable for your usecase, even with the supposed nerfing. Benchmarks are benchmarks. And you can ignore the data at your own risk.
70.
by stale2002 4mo ago
They are actually designated as a terrorist organization by a very large number of countries. Almost every country in that region does, and around the world. Also, they do all sorts of things. The big one was contributing to the deaths man
71.
by stale2002 4mo ago
There are not large 40 thousand plus armed terrorists groups that have been being armed for decades and have been shooting rockets at Israel for years in either Jordan or Egypt. And Syria has significantly improved their relations with Isr
72.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> The western nations that enabled this genocide and colonialist project can take in those who leave. The much much more likely situation is that a third of gazans leave based on plans that western governments have made for gaza that are
73.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> This is yet another reason why they must be quickly stopped. Nuclear weapons are meant to stop countries from being destroyed, for every country that has thems. Thats why countries get those nuclear weapons in the first place. To use
74.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> Fear is not equivalent to zionism. Saying that it's a bad idea to destroy Israel absolutely is Zionist. It's accepting that Israel will exist and attempts to destroy it should not be enacted. In this case, because of the nucl
75.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> they will not be able to sustain themselves A nuclear armed country wouldn't go down without a fight. I'm also not sure who is even left to do anything about Israel. The entirety of Gaza is rubble and southern Lebanon is soon
76.
by stale2002 4mo ago
Having opinions on where tax dollars go has little do to with someone advocating for destroying an entire nuclearly armed country. Basically nobody in the USA wants it do that.
77.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> Try open sourcing a code base that is built up over the last 15 years and most of the devs no longer work there. Thats what you’re asking for many online games. Thats pretty easy actually. All you have to do is go into the setting page
78.
by stale2002 4mo ago
Of course it's true. Israel has 200+ nuclear weapons. Most people aren't stupid enough to think that trying to destroy a country with 200+ nuclear weapons is a good idea. If they understand this simply idea, that makes them a zion
79.
by stale2002 4mo ago
The vast majority of people in the USA do not want to destroy the state of Israel so I am not sure why you are making some conspiracy about (((zionists))) controlling big tech companies. Basically everyone in the US is a zionist. Especiall
80.
by stale2002 4mo ago
There isn't a non-military, non bomb use for the amount of Uranium that Iran was enriching up to the levels that they were doing so. All the things that you talked about do not require doing what Iran was doing. Meaning that... the on
81.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> a mix of extreme economic and diplomatic pressure. None of which matters if the demand that you are making on them would amount to (in their opinion, not yours) their own destruction. There is no threats that you can enact on them th
82.
by stale2002 4mo ago
Israel has a modern military and 200+ nuclear weapons that they would absolutely use in a last resort scenario (like all countries would). They are not going away anytime soon, nor are their days numbered. Like geez, we can't even get
83.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> if no one can run the binaries, despite them being accessible, then the regulation has failed and there will be a new movement to alter the regulation. This isn't the 2000s. People can rent a computer out of a data center. This is
84.
by stale2002 4mo ago
> What are the legal consequences of not releasing a functioning server if for some reason you can't? How about "the government forces you to release the code"? That's seems fair. Unless you hid your source code in US
85.
by stale2002 5mo ago
> do you really believe a basic income funded by it will make up that loss? It won't. Almost definitionally it would. If society is saving a bunch of money on all that saved labor, that extra value is still there, it just needs to
86.
by stale2002 6mo ago
> How would society benefit The same way that society has already benefited and continues to benefit from everything. Wealth across all income brackets continues to go up. > That’s what is what makes me uncomfortable. Then you are unc
87.
by stale2002 6mo ago
> When it's forced by government decree You aren't being forced to do anything that you didn't agree to. You aren't the apartment owner, you instead just signed the contract and have to follow the apartment rules. I
88.
by stale2002 6mo ago
It doesn't have to be criminally illegal. Instead it could simply be civil. The apartment complex, which you do not own, would be the ones setting the rules here. And you, of your own free choice, would have the choice to either follo
89.
by stale2002 6mo ago
> what is the game plan for society moving forward as AI takes more jobs > What happens when more and more people can't afford housing, kids, food, health insurance, etc.? What about when the opposite of this all happens, society
90.
by stale2002 6mo ago
They very directly said this. "but EFF has changed from neutral rights-focused activism into questionable political activism. " This is saying that they strayed from their original mission. They were focused on a narrow set of be

More ›