stale2002

8 ms·

91.
by stale2002 6mo ago
C'mon. You know what they meant. They are clearly saying that the EFF used to to focus on pretty specific, arguably more bipartisan ideas and initiatives and now it has switched to a much more broad strategy that has strayed from its
92.
by stale2002 6mo ago
Its a bit silly to say that they are declining. For its specific niche (mass short form/viral content) there simply aren't any relevant competitors that even come close.
93.
by stale2002 6mo ago
Ok. But mostly its entirely the old software, not the new software, that the bugs are being found in.
94.
by stale2002 6mo ago
Better security is a good thing, no a bad thing, regardless of which companies are more difficult to hack. Hemming and hawing over a clear and obvious good is silly.
95.
by stale2002 6mo ago
> Single market. Not really, they were getting discounted oil prices previously that they are no longer able to get. Also, they are a large importer of oil compared to the US, which is an exporter. They have much more to lose from high
96.
by stale2002 6mo ago
I am not sure why you are operating on such a weird definition of "war" that because 1 thing happened 50+ years ago that changes whats happening now. Just look at whats happening now. Iran is shooting missiles at all sorts of cou
97.
by stale2002 6mo ago
That just means that you agree that there has been a war going on for 50 years which was the OPs point. You are agreeing with the person you responded to.
98.
by stale2002 6mo ago
ok! So if someone uses an existing, checkpointed, open source model then the answer is yes the results are valid and it doesn't matter that the tests are public.
99.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> What makes it “Libertarianism” still? Its libertarian because it is fundamentally about individuals acting on their own without going through the government, ect. It is an individualistic framework. Individuals going about achieving
100.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Geohotz's politics are fairly straightforward once you understand his background. Geohotz is the prodigy child who, at the age of ~16 accomplished amazing technical feats on his own. And his politics are a derivative of Great Man Theo
101.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> Basically all laws related to speech are abitrary. True. This is a fair point. But the expected counter argument would be that the exact line isn't the issue instead it's the justification for the principle. IE why is persona
102.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> Cigarette companies are not legally liable for the consequences their users encounter. Ok! But they do have to follow a bunch of extra laws that cost them a ton of money and/or users. Therefore the same can apply to social media a
103.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Yes any excuse to ignore quantitative metrics. Always switch to the vagueries as opposed to the numbers. This isn't even going into how all of our geopolitical enemies have lost in the relevant wars. Who's even left at this point?
104.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> Every good and enjoyable game made was handcoded, with art, music, dialogue and design created with intent. I am not sure about you, but I do not know a single developer who isn't using LLMs with a passion, even if its only just c
105.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Indeed, this time for sure! All that current evidence that we have that shows otherwise? Doesn't matter! The fact that the trends are actually going the opposite, meaning that the USA is actually pulling out even further ahead? Tha
106.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> it’s brewing. Brewing, always brewing. Never measurable results. > The software industry is about to be decimated by AI anyway and US isn’t ahead in AI in any meaningful sense. The US has been far ahead, in terms of actual companie
107.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Not really. This only works because the US market is valuable. A tech company can simply leave the market rather than sell. Just like tiktok would have been free to shut down in the USA. The USA market belongs to the US, though, and other p
108.
by stale2002 7mo ago
If it works it works. A benefit is a benefit.
109.
by stale2002 7mo ago
So... to be clear... you dont want to get rid of the FCC? You can have that position but you are kinda missing the point here. I was responding to someone who is claiming that the org is some infringement on free speech. This is an igno
110.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Hey if you want to get rid of the FCC entirely so neither party can use it against anyone, I'll all for that!
111.
by stale2002 7mo ago
> Wouldn't that be almost impossible?. Politics affects our lives every day. No it wouldn't be. And if your definition of "politics" includes "literally every time a thing happens" then your definition is s
112.
by stale2002 7mo ago
No, level 14 is Jeff Bezos.
113.
by stale2002 7mo ago
Call it whatever you want, the game wouldn't exist without them doing something about it. And because they did something about achieving their vision other people get to play the game. How about we just call these people the game Prod
114.
by stale2002 8mo ago
Question 1: If a human modifies with themselves with enough sci-fi tier technology are they still "Human"? (And therefore if humans "ascend" past their biology, humanity technically wouldn't survive) Question 2: I
115.
by stale2002 9mo ago
> Never said they weren't. Great! Problem solved then. > A musician can be a listener, indeed. Ok! They can listen to different music then. > Listeners is not an unrelated party to a musician No, musicians do not own other l
116.
by stale2002 9mo ago
> where all the musicians live, and they have no other place to go, only disconnect. No actually. Those musicians are free to continue making whatever music that they want and can refuse to listen to the AI music if they dont want to. T
117.
by stale2002 9mo ago
> Someone said, "using AI is like using an aimbot for music." Ok. Lets go with that analogy. Whats the problem with someone playing a single player game with an aimbot on? Sure they wont get good at the aiming part. But it
118.
by stale2002 9mo ago
Oh I very much have a lot of facts. I'm just not going to waste my time writing a multi paragraph response when we both know that you don't care what the answer is. Feel free to go ask ChatGPT for some answers if you like though.
119.
by stale2002 9mo ago
> I have not ignored any evidence We both know you are. You'll immediately dismiss anything people bring up no matter what it is and then follow up with another fake question. You simply dont care what other people have to say. Wh
120.
by stale2002 9mo ago
Ok if you are just going to ignore all evidence or facts you could have just said that. It you have an opinion, just say it. You don't have to pretend like you care about what other people are saying or what facts or evidence they have

More ›