stale2002

6 ms·

31.
by stale2002 29d ago
> You’re trying to say all groups committing a crime against the government are actual terrorists organizations No, I only said that the ones that are committing terrorist attacks, or similarly serious vigilante violence or sabotaging cr
32.
by stale2002 1mo ago
I don't go around dressed in black with anarchist symbols and wearing a mask, attacking people or destroying stores at riots in the middle of the night, no. I generally stay away from that type of stuff and instead support non-violent,
33.
by stale2002 1mo ago
Like the anarchist groups that dress in all black and attack people/infra/stores in the middle of the night during riot? Its hard to say, because political violence is a spectrum and the border is very blurry between being an orga
34.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> You're missing the distinction between individual action No I'm not. I specially said "in groups".
35.
by stale2002 1mo ago
Yeah, the basic alliance is that anyone who wants to harm the USA nominally is ok with working together regardless of contradicting underlying ideology. That why you'll see russia, iranian, marxist, and anarchist supporters/ideolo
36.
by stale2002 1mo ago
No, its not random people on twitter. If you read the statements that were put it, it involved actual terroristic actions of a variety of groups to sabotage critical infrastructure.
37.
by stale2002 1mo ago
Are you going around planning terrorist attacks, vigilante violence, sabotaging critical infrastructure in groups or consistently materially supporting those who do? If so then yes. If you aren't doing anything even close to this then
38.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> But also, there's no organization called antifa, and no antifa members Left wing extremist groups absolutely exist. The fact that they don't go around wearing matching uniforms with the letters ANTIFA on them doesn't ch
39.
by stale2002 1mo ago
Its not controversial to say that right wing extremists exist, some of which even commit violence, so your analogy isn't the brilliant whataboutism gotcha that you intended it to be. So yes, just like some very far right people exist,
40.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> Putting citizens above profits doesn't seem like a very capitalist thing to do Do you... think that people who are pro capitalism believe that their own ideology is harmful? Obviously proponents of a belief think that their ideas
41.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> Neither capitalism as a system nor corporations have an obligation to improve quality of life for their employees beyond their market value If by capitalism as a system, we are refering to countries that are capitalists, it seems fairl
42.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> What does a CEO(and other managers) do really? The answer is to be responsible to the business. The buck stops at the CEO. Therefore, their responsibilities are technically everything in the entire company. And I think many people w
43.
by stale2002 1mo ago
> Most capitalist countries have 100% employment for their citizens and little to no immigration You must have responded to the wrong post as it has nothing to do with my statement. That statement is that there is nothing about capitalis
44.
by stale2002 1mo ago
Nothing in capitalism prevents a country from prioritizing its own citizens. And it is uncontroversial in most countries that a country should do this. So this isn't a contradiction. Indeed america is capitalist. And it is also prior
45.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> You cannot ignore the contract unless you /are/ a multibillion dollar company and can run the model entirely internally. Or do you propose to run an instance of Kimi K3 on your laptop? I think that there is a large swath of p
46.
by stale2002 2mo ago
Are you trying to imply, without making any direct argument, that this is never a useful frame of reference? In comparison to cloud services, having access to the assembly code can still be quite useful. This is especially true in the moder
47.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> You don't get why people would like to be in control of a powerful new technology You will not have that control. Even if everything were open source. This is because you don't have 100 million dollars of compute. There, th
48.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> The Kimi K3 'weights' are an opaque blob that can only be used by contract. No they are not. You can just ignore the contract. Unless you are a multi-billion dollar company, nobody will notice and you will get away with it.
49.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> people are fearful that the entirety of the internet has been hoovered up Information wants to be free. If you don't like the idea of information, ideas, ect being shared freely for anyone to use just say that. But you aren&#x27
50.
by stale2002 2mo ago
No, being a cyberpunk is not about having some authoritarian control that prevents other people from using technology. Instead it is about empowering the masses. It's about being a rag tag hacker fighting to do stuff that other people
51.
by stale2002 2mo ago
Actually yes they are. Code has been determined to be protected speech.
52.
by stale2002 2mo ago
You have misunderstood my statement. I am saying that someone else would use that output to create or improve a different model. I think you could have figured out that this was the meaning of my statement instead of doing the irrelevant n
53.
by stale2002 2mo ago
> I suppose you think that model providers are not allowed to impose restrictions on the use of their model They should have exactly the same ability to "restrict" it is as the writer of a book on those who read the book that w
54.
by stale2002 3mo ago
> But what will they claim? Copyright infringement obviously. > DOES NOT make a derivative for the purposes of copyright Or maybe you have misunderstood the ruling and thats why the stocks of these companies hasn't plunged. See
55.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Ok, but only if you also conceed that all of these AI companies were stealing to train their models in the first place. Either everyone was stealing all along, and they should all be sued out of existence, or nobody is stealing. Personall
56.
by stale2002 3mo ago
If your definition of VC is "Literally anything that requires a long term investment of money" then sure, but I think most people mean something different than that.
57.
by stale2002 3mo ago
What do you mean, I thought it was fun. Feel free to not make your own music videos, but I am not sure why you would be so upset about other people having fun.
58.
by stale2002 3mo ago
I'm surprised that the Author has missed a very important corollary to the diffusion of "genius theft" that they are bringing up. And that is the diffusion of the beneficiaries. Maybe they think that OpenAI and Anthropic are
59.
by stale2002 3mo ago
The people saying that jobs will all go away because of technology have been wrong every single year, up to this year as well. The burden of proof seems like it's actually on you to show why this current tech boom is any different from
60.
by stale2002 3mo ago
Seeing as we are talking about it now, it seems like they were right that it is interesting to the public. I am not sure why you think social media attention needs to be gate kept.

More ›