ssalka

9 ms·

61.
by ssalka 2y ago
> ruin the evidentiary value of photographs This is going to be a monumental issue when the fact that we can't trust any photographs fully takes hold. Maybe watermarking will help with that. More likely people will develop tools to
62.
by ssalka 2y ago
Freedom of speech is there to protect objectionable/offensive speech, whether it is directed towards the government or otherwise. Objectionable speech is frequently in the crosshairs of pro-censorship folks, and many people think of de
63.
by ssalka 2y ago
As AI image generation (and soon video generation) gets to be a more saturated space, we will end up in the state that you cannot trust anything you see online, even if you are educated, well-informed, and meticulously research the topic. I
64.
by ssalka 2y ago
Fair point, technologists will always innovate faster than politicians are able to regulate. Cat's outta the bag now, but that only means the problem will continue to escalate until more drastic measures are deemed necessary. It's
65.
by ssalka 2y ago
I could very well be wrong about this, and usually I fall more on the e/acc side, but I think deepfakes are perhaps the gravest immediate concern of AI. Yes, they've been around for well over a decade, but never before has their c
66.
by ssalka 2y ago
Even if they get the whole site taken down, I'm pretty sure whoever operates it can just deploy the same thing to any number of other domains. The actual server infrastructure would need to be taken offline, which it sounds like they d
67.
by ssalka 2y ago
I'm guessing this just isn't implemented yet. It feels like a very alpha-stage project, when I sign in with another account and use the URL from my previous session, it tries generating the article again, but seems to be hanging.
68.
by ssalka 2y ago
https://archive.ph/60m6Z
69.
by ssalka 2y ago
This makes me a little uncomfortable. I don't want my phone/laptop to be able to see anything other than what I point its camera at. Having a hard time imagining the benevolent use cases for this, seems it would be best for invasi
70.
by ssalka 2y ago
Any resources online about this alleged trillionaire? And, re: the "billionaires you dont even know about" – do we know for sure that such people exist? I can't imagine it would be easy to keep a low profile with that amount
71.
by ssalka 2y ago
Is building this a reasonable expenditure of tax dollars?
72.
by ssalka 2y ago
Also want to note that the inverse solution that companies could take is to be overly Draconian in moderating content, so as to take down anything that could come back negatively on them (in this case, the role of publisher is assumed and
73.
by ssalka 2y ago
> There is no way to run a targeted ad social media company with 40% margins if you have to make sure children aren’t harmed by your product. More specific than being harmed by your product, Section 230 cares about content you publish
74.
by ssalka 2y ago
Is it just me, or was it always clear that the only thing Incognito mode does is not write to your local browser history? Google's gonna Google, and that means collecting as much of your information as possible. Maybe I'm just j
75.
by ssalka 2y ago
If it goes through I bet you are going to have all sorts of people trying to claim unrealized losses for a tax break, that is gonna be a fun time for the courts.
76.
by ssalka 2y ago
Fair point, more research is needed.
77.
by ssalka 2y ago
Just my initial thoughts from the abstract: > [A]ctivity in Reddit communities shows no evidence of decline, suggesting the importance of social fabric as a buffer against the community-degrading effects of LLMs. This seems rather dising
78.
by ssalka 2y ago
That's Atlantis
79.
by ssalka 2y ago
tried doing: ``` $$('input[type=checkbox]').forEach(elt => elt.click()); ``` and got an alert that said "CHILL LOL". fun site
80.
by ssalka 2y ago
"If the penalty for a crime is a fine, that law only exists for the lower classes"
81.
by ssalka 2y ago
Because all the devs are probably using Macbooks?
82.
by ssalka 2y ago
That may be the case, but I think many people will hear "Boeing" and immediately classify them along with Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grunman, Raytheon etc.
83.
by ssalka 2y ago
I think if Boeing care's about their reputation so badly, they'd get out of the defense contractor business. But there's too much money to be made there. Silencing whistleblowers could be very beneficial to their bottom line:
84.
by ssalka 3y ago
I was delighted to find The Numbers from LOST: https://oeis.org/A104101
85.
by ssalka 3y ago
I could see it slowly approaching the open source model - you do it because you care, and maybe some people will donate to you because they want to see your work continue. You can also say you've done it, so if you're a prolific a
86.
by ssalka 3y ago
I wonder if this is the reason Comcast suddenly decided to double my internet speed today (they were forced to and then took credit because they're such good guys): > # We've increased your internet speeds to show you our appre
87.
by ssalka 3y ago
I wonder if this will actually be adopted by the community, unlike SD. 2.0. Many are still developing around SD 1.5 due to its uncensored nature. SDXL has done better than 2.0, but has greater hardware requirements so still can't be us
88.
by ssalka 3y ago
I'm guessing this won't be including issues & PRs from private repos, which could be substantial
89.
by ssalka 3y ago
Unfortunately, it does, I think there are going to be some complex legal battles over this
90.
by ssalka 3y ago
The "it" means access to the content ;) /s

More ›