"and there’s maybe a case to be made for him exercising that power here to fire all of them if they cannot definitively prove who it was after investigation in

"and there’s maybe a case to be made for him exercising that power here to fire all of them if they cannot definitively prove who it was after investigation in order to defend the integrity of the Court’s deliberation process. If they can at least narrow down that it was in fact a clerk and not some other staffer and definitely not a Justice (probably wasn’t, but still better to go through the investigation), then I can’t say I would disagree with that outcome." That would be a batshit bonkers move, frankly. Luckily, that doesn't seem to be Roberts's style.