sriram_malhar

48 ms·

1.
by sriram_malhar 6d ago
Beautiful presentation!
2.
by sriram_malhar 6d ago
There was a level of patent/copyright protection, there was a level of awareness of stealing, a company could be taken to a court of law. A writer of a PhD thesis could show that someone lifted huge parts of a dissertation without attr
3.
by sriram_malhar 6d ago
Why do we need more? Why is that not a big enough reason. If a modern-day Beethoven were told that his work will be slurped in by a machine and he will remain unknown to the world, would it be acceptable to him? To you?
4.
by sriram_malhar 10d ago
I just did this for the first time. <aside/>I lost interest in programming for pleasure (thank you LLMs), so decided to spend a few years learning all the prerequisites to understand the General Theory of Relativity. It is so nic
5.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
C'mon, you know better than to invoke a slippery slope. My best move is to influence the people I care about to reduce dependence on these things and seek happiness in non-tech things (where tech is defined as those controlled by corpo
6.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
Constraints are a good thing. I'll get creative with what I have, instead of having to rely on a supply chain that makes everything available to everybody all the time. I don't have to have apples grown on the other side of the pl
7.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
It isn't just AI. I would like a world without the poison of social media, without guns & bombs, without dangerous chemicals. Yes, in many many ways we'd be better off. We are accelerating the destruction of our planet. I don&
8.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
You can look up laws all night long. Check out all the laws broken by Potus, ICE (just to name a few) on a daily basis. The peasantry is not on the side that enforces the law. AI is. AI is a force multiplier. The more force you have, the mo
9.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
You do realize that the same powers that have bred fascism and mandatory id requirement are hand in glove with the AI oligarchs, no? They gain with rampant use of AI disproportionately more than the peasant. The peasantry stands no chance.
10.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
> Have you been schooled in farming? Raising livestock? Milking cattle? Does your ability to cook good food ... Pushing that analogy, AI is the equivalent of automating everything from tilling, growing, all the way to cooking. It is as i
11.
by sriram_malhar 13d ago
Everyone who writes enthusiastically about AI already has the benefit of having worked without AI. They have been schooled in the basics. Enough of us know about data structures, concurrency, networks, language design etc. from the ground u
12.
by sriram_malhar 18d ago
Can it scale without pixelating?
13.
by sriram_malhar 22d ago
Ah, I had virtual threads in Java 8 back in the day. I believe it still works. Check Kilim: https://github.com/kilim/kilim
14.
by sriram_malhar 2mo ago
If you check "jealousy" (instead of "jealous") on MW, you get this editorial note: Depending on who you ask, jealousy and envy are either exact synonyms, totally different words, or near-synonyms with some degree of sema
15.
by sriram_malhar 2mo ago
An aged uncle of mine (who loved his wife very much) once said, "I hope she goes before me. I'd never want her to face the pain of my leaving". Such love.
16.
by sriram_malhar 2mo ago
They may be equivalent in common parlance, but that’s a bit like saying it is ok to use ‘your’ instead of “you’re” just because it is so common. We say “jealously guarded’ not ‘enviously guarded’ for a reason. Jealousy is about being protec
17.
by sriram_malhar 2mo ago
<snark/>Is it easier to say 'non-profit' compared to 'not making profits'? But seriously, can someone explain why openai went this route?
18.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
Vint had an interview?!! Who had the gall to suggest he needs to come in and be evaluated?
19.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
"for now"
20.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
Nicely done.
21.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
You still used AI, even if the results weren't correct.
22.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
Not the first result. The AI summary generated by gemini.
23.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
This feels so quaint today. How I'd like to be back in that timeframe.
24.
by sriram_malhar 3mo ago
Anyone who does a Google search gets a satisfactory looking answer as the very first entry. I daresay most people don't go beyond that, not even the entries on the first page, let alone go to the next. I argue that this is at the leve
25.
by sriram_malhar 4mo ago
What a beautiful explanation. Wow! This is hands down the clearest exposition I have encountered. Kudos.
26.
by sriram_malhar 4mo ago
The level of corruption is staggering.
27.
by sriram_malhar 4mo ago
I wasn't aware of this. The first edition came out in 1991. The 4th ed came out in 2012, by which time Perl was no longer the duct tape of the internet. Perl 6 had muddied the waters, and Ruby and Rails had peaked. Still, 1000 is painf
28.
by sriram_malhar 4mo ago
That’s not true. I wrote the Panther book, Advanced Perl Programming, and easily made way more than 100k. Of the 25-30 or so dollars the books cost, I got 10% per copy, or $2 after taxes. The first print run of 35000 sold within the first t
29.
by sriram_malhar 5mo ago
Doesn't anyone here have _one_ kind word to say about its features? Every one seems to be starting with "on the other hand".
30.
by sriram_malhar 6mo ago
Uh, dayumm. I don't know how I got that wrong.

More ›