srdjanr

6 ms·

31.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
Security researcher is a common term, there's also market research which doesn't look like it falls under your definition
32.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
The root comment is talking about adding blood, breath, urin, spit... analysis. For body imaging only I agree with you. But if we add all this, I guess we'd be able to rule out many false positives
33.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
Are more plants coming? I think I heard it won't be many of them, because it's risky. If the bubble bursts and RAM demand drops, then they'll have big losses. And that's not an impossible scenario over the few X years th
34.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
I don't mind it here at all, in fact I didn't even notice it's AI before reading this comment. It's clearly not a one-shot AI slop but a well thought out and edited by a human post. Not everyone who has something interes
35.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
These all look fine to me, and I don't think I'd assume they're AI generated. There definitely is a distinct AI "design" look, I just don't really see it here.
36.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
> Nobody is arguing for unsafe models Then what are people arguing for? I see only two totally distinct options: unsafe models or someone being the arbiter of safety
37.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
It seems like they run a classifier model before going to Fable (or falling back to Opus), so it should be fine
38.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
My understanding is that it's designed for fixed-size documents? There's a big difference between a layout system for that, and one where size of a document can vary wildly, up to completely opposite aspect ratios
39.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
There's a difference between the driver intentionally driving into crowd, and not intentionally but possibly still recklessly (drifting and losing control, falling asleep, etc). In those cases I would probably use "car hits the cr
40.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
We should treat it as attempted attack in the sense of preparing for the next one, but I don't see why we should call it "attack" without any evidence
41.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
I frequently tell agent to do something, wait ~10 min (which is just enough that I can't/don't want to start anything else), ask it to change something, wait a few minutes again, and so on. So I'm basically idle while wa
42.
by srdjanr 4mo ago
Why should the chatbot team necessarily take the blame? For all we know, they could have got approval from the tool team to make it public, and passed additional security review for making it public. Also, why fire anyone after a single mis
43.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Well fun can be the gain
44.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Why? You can (and should) ask for consent, and you already need to trust your app (assuming Teams etc) for calls/messages. You can also run transcription models locally
45.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
I wouldn't call floods "very common"
46.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
I read it, and it is AI
47.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Whether I'm using Google or not is completely unrelated to whether I use OpenAI (for example) API or run LLM locally
48.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Products will low/negative margins just won't happen or will get killed. But if the margin increases, they might live. Also with higher margins, more money can be invested in research/experimental products
49.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
It definitely is visible, OS login screens usually warn you if caps lock is on when typing password
50.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
The harm is in actually believing AI has wants, intentions, feelings, etc. Saying that I killed a process won't make me more likely to believe that a process is human-like, because it's quite obviously not. But because AI does sou
51.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
It's a tradeoff. LLMs stopping and asking more would make them less useful. I'd much rather let an agent run for 1 hour, than it wanting my input every 15 mins, even if results are somewhat worse. The real solution for security is
52.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Of course there are examples of software killing or being capable of killing (operating machinery or medical devices), but that doesn't apply to probably 90+% of software
53.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
Genuine question: why not just wait? If Bun stays great, you saved yourself some time for switching, and got to keep using Bun. If Bun worsens, you spend the same time for switching, just moved a bit later, and got to use Bun for a little l
54.
by srdjanr 5mo ago
The author gave a few examples where compiled/minified code is public (Javascript and games) or automated vuln exploits (Wordpress example). That does explain nature of threat well enough for me. There's a whole spectrum between 9
55.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
> Nonfamilial early-onset AD can develop in people who are in their 30s or 40s, but this is extremely rare, and mostly people in their 50s or early 60s are affected. Depending on what you consider "old", this might not change m
56.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
It's a reference to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863
57.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
Why is "ignorant" a synonym for "bad" (as a moral judgement, like "bad person")? It just means you don't know something, which is usually a relatively bad situation for you, but it doesn't make you a
58.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
Well flying blind is unsafe guessing (ignoring modern instruments), that's a fact. But only "flying" and "blind" together. No one thinks this makes the word "flying" has a negative connotation here, and sa
59.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
> We’re far from the ultimate physical limit, but reversibility still provides practical efficiency gains today. I'd love to hear more about this. Where it's used today and how big are the gains?
60.
by srdjanr 6mo ago
The point was only that Linus didn't build git in 8 days and alone.

More ›