3 ms·
I read it, and it is AI
by srdjanr 5mo ago
I read it, and it is AI
- jorisw 5mo agoI don't think it is. Just the (somewhat lame) graphics are.
- Zambyte 5mo agoThe text is very obviously heavily authored using AI. The more interesting question is: did a person even prompt an LLM to write on this subject? It seems likely that someone set up an agent using OpenClaw or something to just automatically write articles on popular topics in AI, and this is something that it came up with
- gpugreg 5mo agoSorry to say, but it almost certainly is AI. - 51 EM-dashes - Section headings - Excessive repetitions: "The [...] are real. The [...] are real. The [...] is real. All three things are true at once." - Excessive use of "genuine", "genuinely", "honest", "real", "true" - Excessive use of "gap": "near-term gap", "the Compute Gap", "the Narrative Gap", "critical gap" - Corny and meaningless closing sentence: "Understanding both parts is the beginning of taking AI deployment decisions seriously."
- hugh-avherald 5mo agoI don't believe my 20 year old university essays were written by AI, despite your criteria.
- gpugreg 5mo agoDo your 20 year old university essays really fulfill all those criteria at once?
- leokeba 5mo agoIt most definitely is.
- Reason077 5mo agoMy slop sensor went off a couple of paragraphs in. The high word count, mild brewing melodrama, circling back on variations of the same point over and over. Still an interesting topic, but a good human author could have used 50-70% less words to make the same argument.