squirrelly

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by squirrelly 7y ago

   ORLY? Redshift is half the cost of Snowflake for any given level of performance. The bigger your dataset to wider the gap will be.
2. 2.▲
   by squirrelly 7y ago

   Ha, $500k/year is the amount a salesperson can knock off the cost of Teradata 100TB setup without calling their boss. As for ops stuff, I guess YMMV. We’ve never had any significant issues. Tuning is the same or less than on-prem syste
3. 3.▲
   by squirrelly 7y ago

   > Redshift falls over near the 100TB level. This is based on what? They have stated in various presentations that they have customers using 1pb clusters.
4. 4.▲
   by squirrelly 7y ago

   Snowflake has one answer to every question. Use more compute == Spend more money. E.g. Q: “This query is 2x slower than Redshift?” A: $