Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
squigz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
601.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Being downvoted is not remotely "censorship"
602.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Maybe that says more about your biases than it does about the intelligence of 8 billion people though.
603.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
The threat profile changes, sure, but framing all the threats imposed by using large-scale foreign clouds as "imaginary", and every threat introduced by local providers as "real", is very disingenuous. > most service
604.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
> because the alternative is either building everything in-house or relying on local providers that frankly don't have the same feature set or reliability. Neither of these seem like a terrible outcome. Relying on local providers wo
605.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Well I'm Canadian, so... But going off what I said, I acknowledged this sort of legislation is bad and that a right to privacy is needed. How do you arrive at "beatdown citizens in a government they have no passion about"? Al
606.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
I'm very curious what people in this thread think is happening now Do you think Meta, Google and them are not scanning every bit of data hosted on their servers to ensure they're not hosting things they don't want to? Do yo
607.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Awareness of the reality, yes, but there's no reason to play people's emotions to get them "aware" of it - or in other words, get them angry about it.
608.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
People on average are really not that stupid and are absolutely capable of looking back a few years for context.
609.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Is the assumption that 100% - or even close to it - of boys need a male mentor? How much of the remaining 28% have a female mentor? Also, that specifies "for schoolwork." Surely there's many boys that have a male they can tur
610.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Flagging has a small karma requirement (with no mention of more weighting for more karma) Accounts that inappropriately flag too many posts have their flagging privileges revoked https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12173836
611.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
I don't see how being emotional vulnerable means letting your emotions "dominate your behavior in dysfunctional ways"
612.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
If you manage to "self-monitor" all the time, and never show more than a modicum of vulnerability, that seems very disconnected to me. Perhaps 'disconnected' is the wrong word, but what I mean is that emotionally healthy
613.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
> I recall seeing some fairly befuddling ones, like "Study finds that being in a green environment with plants & flowers reduces depression" etc., how do you even quantify this into numbers? "Effects of things on depre
614.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
This is a brilliant comment. I'd like to elaborate on something you touch on briefly: > I'm asking people without any ability to help me with it to just take it and work it out with me, and that's not helpful. > that so
615.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
I've not read much of Holmes, so I can't really speak to the original character, but I would point out that the "he can socialize, he just doesn't like to" bit is somewhat part of BBC's Sherlock too - look at t
616.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
How often do patients request this? Do surgeons ever say no? I would think there's a risk of distraction here.
617.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
That isn't the point of studies finding results that seem "intuitive" The point is that designing laws, regulations, guidelines, safety standards, etc, based on "intuition" is not very rational.
618.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Was I just described not only as "effortlessly confident" but also "emotionally stable"? That's new. My crippling depressing and social anxiety will be glad to hear it!
619.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Why would I seek emotional support from someone so disconnected from their emotions they can't show more than a "modicum" of vulnerability? How could I trust someone's resilience when they don't show they've be
620.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
I'm not sure what this is trying to say? Can you elaborate please?
621.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Oof, this comment was really nice up until the end. Accepting responsibility, expressing regret, etc. > If someone is extremely upset or hurt by my comment then, I think, at some stage that isn’t my fault and the Internet might not be ri
622.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Not really, it's just that most of us are adults who have experiences with healthy adult relationships. "Is my partner going to leave me if I display emotional vulnerability" is not really a concern in healthy, adult relation
623.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Your experiences don't validate the rule, either.
624.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Not everyone's partner is that shallow.
625.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
$200+ a night and it doesn't come with a bathroom door? This is why I just stay home.
626.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
Taking the reasons at face value (for the sake of argument) I guess what I'm confused about is why this would be necessary. I would think there were already laws/regulations/liability reasons/etc requiring companies to m
627.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
What happened to the old school hacker spirit of helping others and sharing knowledge?
628.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
> When it comes to CRTs this is probably more true today that it was when this was written. I can imagine a future though where more people seek to repair their non-CRT monitors as stores stop selling normal computer monitors to push &qu
629.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
> If they can figure out how to get the right kickbacks/referrals without compromising user trust and really nail the search and aggregation of data this could be a real money-maker. As another commenter points out, "not compro
630.
▲
by
squigz
11mo ago
I've seen this mentioned a few times lately. Not that I disagree, but why would that be? Is it just Github's poplarity? Is it the ease with which you can sign on and start yelling at FOSS maintainers? Something else?
More ›