Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spynxic
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Your solution gives merit to the individual for making the comment as opposed to the the content of comment itself. Similar to a democracy where the individual is a representative of quality content.
32.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> probably because thats like a million times more work? I assume you're referring to the "detection" part. Perhaps in the early 2000s this was true, prior to the widespread application of natural language processing; when
33.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
And the story continues -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra
34.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> I'm struggling mightily to get my path planner project to work properly Having not completed an AI course, I tread lightly.. However, I would guess that this project involves re-implementing an established solution. -- It is work
35.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
The coverage of chain-in-command in this answer is so on point. One could literally follow each sentence to determine the culprit of any issue. Bravo - A+ in troubleshooting.
36.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Fostering exploration and presenting opportunity is essentially forcing exposure, however, choice is not suppressed by force.
37.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Forcing exposure onto someone is, physically, the only way one can leverage their own ability to change another's mindset. Beyond exposure, it's a matter of individual choice. ( i.e. consider when one tries foreign foods for th
38.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> The point being that everyone had motives for it to exist but no one would profit directly from it, only through it. It's like the police, or the state itself, or public streets: collectively supported. The Open Source community n
39.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> Its fuel is also renewable because uranium dissolved in seawater will replenish through erosion faster than we could ever use it for billions of years. It's been an hour and still no one's caught this but.. what exactly is th
40.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> ..I thought this would be long done by now. I evolved into thinking this is actually somewhat of a hard problem (per real-world constraints of all kinds, ie social, political, ethical, not strictly technically) that I want to actively
41.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> But I eventually gave up, because I think the biggest developers who would adopt this are heavy 3D graphics companies Is lack of viable adoption by users the only reason you gave the project up?
42.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Ideally, promoters would always be trusted experts. Question is: How do those experts, without engaging other promoters, discover potential tracks for promotion?
43.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> Would that be, to all intents and purposes, undetectable by us then? In so far as our means for measuring particles doesn't change; namely, smashing things together at extremely high energies. If you suppose that there are methods
44.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> It seems the greater question is, "What is the employer paying for?" This agreement is typically unspoken upon initial employment, leaving many employees at a position to take a loss during the production of assets outside of
45.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Age signifies the robusticity of a creature
46.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> ..We now have the luxary to afford more then we actually need to survive so we strive to have more and more. I've come to the conclusion that this is primary issue with a establishing a universal income. Providing everyone with a
47.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Perhaps the solution could be approached from the receiving end, during decompression, given some kind of information about the appropriate form of the decompressed stream.
48.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> It will stop when you hand a computer a __(representation)__ and an __(embodiment)__ as well as the style of your favorite __(artist)__ and then it will produce the __(artwork)__. Think of it as the ultimate in __(*)__.
49.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
I would imagine even in the beginning that they, as developers, practiced good procedures while scouring the internet. Given the difference in the size of the internet now and then, the backlash faced for poor practices may not be comparabl
50.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
Allowing a site to only be scraped/crawled by professionals (i.e. Google) ensures that those engaging such activity do so in a respectable manner. It would be ideal to define the terms for scraping (similar to how API calls work) as op
51.
▲
by
spynxic
9y ago
> "The Chinese government decides what to run and clearly that is propaganda. In America the media is controlled by 2 political parties.." Is this thread attempting to argue that either means of propagating propaganda is more
52.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
"..After learning a task, we compute how important each connection is to that task." Anyone know if this was expanded on in the whitepaper?
53.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
To everyone reminiscing in this thread: Better make a repository of your works, quickly! Who is to say it will be the same site in a few months, or weeks.
54.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
I consider this as an object of argument as well, however, axioms seem to be the underlying structure of repetition for all proofs [as far as I understand mathematics].
55.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
> To compensate for this horrible feedback mechanism you need to basically play the popularity game Feedback needn't be a necessity in a work. Assessments and criticism will come if the work is essential, perhaps many years in the f
56.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
"gravity off" is a lofty term to toss around so freely. Consider an omnipresent force or curvature vanishing one spot. I can't imagine gravity but the effects in an ocean would obviously be to fill the hole with massive force
57.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
> (though it contains many separate models which if unified would contain contradictions) Contradictions suggest that you don't have a complete picture
58.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
> that's cool, how does that work?" not "I want to cure cancer" With regards to your final note: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_and_bottom-up_design
59.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
"They cautioned that gene editing technology is far cheaper and easier to access than nuclear or chemical weapons." The potential dangers from gene editing shouldn't be put in the same light as artificial intelligence or nucl
60.
▲
by
spynxic
10y ago
"For example, Pyret trades performance for mathematical familiarity by using exact representations of rational numbers as its primary number type." (Disclaimer: I haven't used Pyret) But.. maybe the language allows the de
More ›