springtimesun

4 ms·

1.
by springtimesun 8d ago
I have this in a rules file. It respects it. The only thing that broke recently was when they added the session links. That needed an explicit additional rule. Sometimes rules don’t get added to worktrees but I haven’t had the patience to i
2.
by springtimesun 8d ago
This is where I landed when a recent(ish) change broke symlinking for rules files. I didn’t like how hacky it was a first, but now I’m glad I did it. The same hook drives specific rules the non-Claudes get per repo.
3.
by springtimesun 12d ago
I was in the same boat around March. I started with Claude and giving it really specific instructions about what I wanted. That turned in to more interactive planning sessions where after we nailed everything down I said, ok just do it and
4.
by springtimesun 12d ago
Yes, I'm with you 100% on the setup. You can go as deep as you want down the hole. At some point I had ask myself what I was really after with the benchmarks and where the line of diminishing returns was (and more importantly, was I re
5.
by springtimesun 13d ago
Yes at temperature 1 it would need to be averaged. The mechanical scoring is hidden specs through and if they don’t pass that it’s not often a result of temp, but instruction following or verification (different flavor of instruction follow
6.
by springtimesun 13d ago
Curiosity and anxiety. I rebuilt my entire workflow around agents so the unease that the frontiers would change something (access, pricing, availability) and lock me out of that were high. Also why I spent way too much on hardware (at least
7.
by springtimesun 13d ago
In open weights models on a similar metric I find this to be highly specific to role and model. Some models are just diggers by nature, but all will verify more if you tell them to. Have you tried running a Claude watcher with the same role
8.
by springtimesun 13d ago
I built exactly this using my own codebases. The setup isn’t that complex; split the git history to just before the change, sandbox the agent with everything they will need at that commit and lightly modify rules so they don’t go searching
9.
by springtimesun 14d ago
Haha, I thought about this today. I'm traveling and walked through a university campus. The new students are coming in and I thought wow, wouldn't it be wild to be a fresh in student in the age of AI (it's been a long time si
10.
by springtimesun 14d ago
There has to be a changing economic undertone to it as well. For a lot of years, the craft that many people enjoyed also happened to pay well and had significant barriers to entry. It's easy to like the craft when it pays you well. The
11.
by springtimesun 15d ago
I thought the last round was the (JS) framework wars
12.
by springtimesun 16d ago
That’s fascinating and gives me even more respect for how well maintainers know their code sections.
13.
by springtimesun 16d ago
I think I am on your arc as well. My learning on different topics is growing every day, but there’s a limit to how much I can absorb. With the LLMs the experiments stay just beyond that horizon and I keep chasing. Stated too strongly, but I
14.
by springtimesun 16d ago
I realized the same while reading it, but my impression is that the output has been well edited. The typical Claude density has been pulled out into something more human readable, but with many of the Claud-isms still intact. Personally I f
15.
by springtimesun 18d ago
But, Kimi thought for 36k tokens before writing it.
16.
by springtimesun 22d ago
I have been using a PR branch to run GLM 5.3 flash locally so I have been watching the dueling PRs develop to implement it and all the comments and reviews. You're right the scale of it is huge. The speed with which maintainers and com
17.
by springtimesun 25d ago
I am.
18.
by springtimesun 28d ago
Yes, I thought when I was starting that 1u and 2u form factors were to save space. Maybe they are, but they also have the advantage of moving air front to back very effectively through and over the components. Though there still must be som
19.
by springtimesun 29d ago
I find 10 to be very usable. It’s not (that) interactive but it chews through tasks. I let Kimi churn away at 4 overnight and it gives good results that are ready for me in the morning.
20.
by springtimesun 29d ago
I’ll be very curious what you get with DDR4. I also almost went that way. I have an Epyc DDR 5 rig and the best I see is 10 tok/s. Caveat being that’s at Q8 and a 4090 doing pre fill so it could be pushed up. The surprising thing for m
21.
by springtimesun 29d ago
I don't disagree in principle, but there's got to be a ceiling at some complexity. Teach them to prompt their way into a Twitter clone in a month (or less), sure. Teach them to prompt their way into a Bun rewrite in Rust in a mont
22.
by springtimesun 1mo ago
This is something devs don’t give enough credit. You may think you’re just promoting, but ask someone outside the field to prompt their way to a feature and you will see very clearly what your experience is bringing to the table.
23.
by springtimesun 1mo ago
I’m m just starting to get results on a local/cloud agent pipeline I’ve been building. I don’t think I will ever code again. Plan, review, read, architect, test, yes. Code though simply doesn’t make sense when I’m getting these results
24.
Ask HN: When did Claude Fable start giving summarized thinking?
2 points by springtimesun 1mo ago|0 comments
25.
by springtimesun 1mo ago
Current Rails and Co are miles away from where they used to be then, but even then my feeling was that maybe it was the skill/culture/dev ops at Twitter that was at least partly responsible for the fail whale. But I don’t have any
26.
by springtimesun 1mo ago
I like this approach and I would be pretty happy if this is the way models go, but my question is: go look it up where? Search quality is declining for multiple reasons and I don’t see it becoming better. At best it might be able to outrun
27.
by springtimesun 1mo ago
My observation is that finance and banking and corporate functions high enough up the ladder operate more like a clubhouse than cutthroat businesses. You’d think all you need to do is make a better interface, but if you’re not part of the c
28.
by springtimesun 2mo ago
Very clever. You might have said "browser engine" to be more precise and avoid the child comments misunderstanding, but Apple deserves this burn.
29.
by springtimesun 2mo ago
I have not that many things in life that I try to live by. One is that when presented with contradictory evidence, evaluate it honestly and, if you evaluate it to be correct, in full or in part, change your belief freely and without apology
30.
by springtimesun 2mo ago
What’s missing to me in all this is: did it succeed in its initial task? And then, did it stop? I feel like whether I should be scared or not hangs on those questions

More ›