spaceborn

5 ms·

1.
by spaceborn 13y ago
It's not really an angle, but mostly a response to the content of your comment and certain other comments to be found in this thread, and my own general observations (which are hardly scientific of course). At any rate, you've not
2.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Why don't you address the comment you're responding to instead of lobbing insults?
3.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Perhaps you should elaborate on your own deep understanding of the subject rather than simply alluding to it. Why is it that SJW types are so quick to insult and demean anyone who disagrees with them? It's very unpleasant. Your beliefs
4.
by spaceborn 13y ago
How incredibly rude and condescending. Is there some good reason you chose not to include his whole statement in your quote? If you have to misrepresent the views of those you disagree with in order to argue your own point, it might be the
5.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Yes, I understand the association. Again: why? It seems he's doing fine as-is. I don't see what harm it does him.
6.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Why? Looks like he's doing fine as-is.
7.
by spaceborn 13y ago
"DARK IGLOO IS A COMPANY THAT SPECIALIZES: BRANDING, ILLUSTRATION, PHOTOGRAPHY, VIDEO" Right on their front page, guy.
8.
by spaceborn 13y ago
I prefer not to be forced to use correct indentation. I do so as a matter of course. And on the odd occasion I have some reason to use odd indentation, I want to be able to do that too. I like to write my code according to my own judgement.
9.
by spaceborn 13y ago
There may be a culture, but Python is simply a tool. One doesn't need to be a "Pythonic thinker" to use that tool. I'm not saying this is the most /sensible/ idea/project, but I see nothing in particular w
10.
by spaceborn 13y ago
How so? No one is being deceived. Everyone who participates does so of their own volition. Is individual volition repulsive? Are they really dumb? Is the guy in the middle of the scheme who makes out with a profit dumb? There's known r
11.
by spaceborn 13y ago
It was an earnest question. I'm not familiar with slahdot or it's community.
12.
by spaceborn 13y ago
> That Russia has a reasonable political platform regarding its LGBT citizens? Are you saying that this position can simply be disregarded out of hand? That strikes me as disrespectful and self-important. If nothing else it is non-conduc
13.
by spaceborn 13y ago
> one-sided use of the site to promote specific political views How do you mean? I've not encountered any similar community which isn't also a political echo chamber - unless you're talking about something more specific th
14.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Good god, the comments on this article. You'd think the author went deliberately out of her way to not photograph women, and that she did so as a personal affront to the commenters.
15.
by spaceborn 13y ago
I suspect this article may have been written for an audience with a collectively higher level of reading comprehension than what you describe.
16.
by spaceborn 13y ago
> the article's credibility is killed by the use of the word dead How? The author clearly doesn't mean "out of business" when he says "dead". He means that what Microsoft once was, or what it represented, is
17.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Are you implying that every single passenger aboard a normal commercial flight is there for some absolutely necessary, useful purpose? I'd wager not, in which case a large quantity of the fuel used in the normal course of operations is
18.
by spaceborn 13y ago
Intentionally provocative? It's simply a counter argument.