sova

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   Show HN: Japanese Complete Book 1 Released

   165 points by sova 4y ago|99 comments
2. 62.▲
   Show HN: Japanese Complete Book One Released(amazon.com)

   4 points by sova 4y ago|1 comments
3. 63.▲
   by sova 5y ago

   Osborn's words from his own book where the term was first used: Every day, everywhere in a democracy, juries are proving that a dozen minds can jointly judge and judge well. But that’s judicial thinking; how about creative thinking
4. 64.▲
   by sova 5y ago

   Let's start one via IPFS. How can we improve this to have fast delivery? Maybe a client application and centralized server for the "buddy list," AIM-style. Yellow Submarine. We All Live in One. Thoughts?
5. 65.▲
   ElectriCushion Review of Album “This New Heaven” by Fine Place(electricushion.wordpress.com)

   1 points by sova 5y ago|0 comments
6. 66.▲
   by sova 5y ago

   I wrote a handbook a little over a year ago about creating startups [0]. One of the most important points is ensuring that your product addresses a market gap. Demand cannot be created, it can only be awakened. In brief, one must: identif
7. 67.▲
   Show HN: One-Sentence Album Reviews(electricushion.wordpress.com)

   4 points by sova 5y ago|0 comments
8. 68.▲
   by sova 5y ago

   I was thinking more about power shifts, not inequitable comparisons :D
9. 69.▲
   by sova 5y ago

   Self-discipline is a better predictor than IQ according to this paper from 2005. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.368...
10. 70.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Did you see this one? http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.368...
11. 71.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    You know, I did a google scholar search for this "fact" and in 2005 a research paper shows that self-discipline outperforms IQ by a factor of 2.
12. 72.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    IIT
13. 73.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Can you provide evidence for this claim?
14. 74.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Glad you found it. A very simple explanation I heard a while back (NPR?) was that the system is able to keep "mugshots" of intruders it has seen and then snip their DNA when there's a match with the mugshot.
15. 75.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Tangentially relevant is the way CRISPR works, and I would recommend the Nobel acceptance speeches by Jennifer Doudna and Charpentier.
16. 76.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Thank you so much for taking the time to explain that. This is something I wish I had read before going to uni. Knowing how to skillfully "extract knowledge" from an expert with a powerful question is a skill in itself. I wish
17. 77.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Yeah it's called Arc :D
18. 78.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    His name is dang not darn :P
19. 79.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    it's a practice reaching as far back as cartography itself
20. 80.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Well yeah, but is your friend who works at <social media company> going to risk their position & salary there for some sketchy hook up that's less lucrative?
21. 81.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    the links are the media, and the comments are also media. newspapers are media, right? so are digital newspapers also media? what about just a collection of headlines?
22. 82.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    and what did they mean? delete your facebook and instagram? I guess the focus is on the "content" and not the "people" but I didn't really know they were distinct categories until now
23. 83.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    smoke signals are also media (as in mediums)
24. 84.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Really? Do you have any evidence to support this claim?
25. 85.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    hacker news is not social and not media? :)
26. 86.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    If you know someone who works there (Kafkaesque absurdity surrounding social-media operators) you can recover an account asking for help politely.
27. 87.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    You bring up a great point and humorously at that. Thanks for the clarification.
28. 88.▲
    Ask HN: Getting More Users via Affiliate Kickbacks

    1 points by sova 5y ago|0 comments
29. 89.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    I think hearing something would be direct evidence, as opposed to indirect. Plus, aren't we supposed to err on the side of "innocent until proven guilty?" And I think for such a crime as you were describing there needs to b
30. 90.▲
    by sova 5y ago

    Is there prior art to suggest that tweets about going private indubitably result in damaged warrants? This notion seems dismissible by pointing out that correlation is not causation, but I am oversimplifying and that would be for a judge to