sometimelurker

5 ms·

61.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I wonder how/if they'll use AI for this. maybe this would give them access to some very highquality pretrain data (like who made which bet on what at what time), which I can definitely imagine them needing. I've heard they ha
62.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
um, I'm not sure exactly why what motivated that comment, but its extremely possible to believe every word there from a purely logical perspective, as opposed to an emotional one. yes we shouldn't post personal attacks, but saying
63.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
> likely people will still have jobs/ doing what though? in a really literal sense, if an LLM can do RLVR, that's optimization over the space of algorithms, and so anything with a measurable goal at the end can be incentivized.
64.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
of course its a summary of the CoT, there's so many reasons I can think of from both business (anti-distillation from china) and safety (users might `thumbs-up` or thumbs-down a conversation differently depending on the CoT, putting un
65.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I was hoping for more analysis here :\ like from a technical standpoint, why is the doom and gloom incorrect? I've heard some really interesting arguments for that, and non of them are here.
66.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
LLMs actually aren't simple Markov chains tho, your also simplifying. and LLMs trained with RLVR aren't just optimized over the space of functions (like gpt2 was), they're optimized over the space of programs (programs under
67.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
ehh ur right but there's a lot of nuance here. if you have a system that doesn't hallucinate a ton and is still very "creative" that's great, and probably much better than a hallucinating system regardless of its cr
68.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I think they eventually will, using the style of the prompts or code, various metadata floating around on the computer theyre working on, if it can be done theoreticly, then it can be trained against (maybe even unintentionally) no idea how
69.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
"the people" cant tell if they use a smaller/cheaper LLM when cursor is writing a simple file
70.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
> not silently switch models under the hood isn't that totally unprovable given what the user sees, given that its silent ? if they wanted to do this it would be super easy to just fully replace the larger model with its MTP coun
71.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
isn't a method used by smaller groups with less popular ideas to try to shift the overton window in their favor? if that's the case with Sanders then his goal wouldn't be to make his bills passable, it would be to shift the
72.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
sovereign wealth fund? like Texas or Alaska or Norway or Saudi Arabia? this doesn't sound like a bad idea. hope the bots dont downvote me to hell :)
73.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_racism , probably. I think the Flint Michigan water crisis falls into this category but feel free to correct me
74.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
yeah I use one one the small MTP qwens and pi
75.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I just set my add blocker to stop suggestions.
76.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I don't like this shift in the Overton window, or at least their perspection of the Overton window. I really do like their open work on mech interp tho. least bad AI lab imo. also if they do this or not is unprovable and other labs wil
77.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
> ...ch less likely for people to start developing such a novel genetically engineered virus. only people that would do this would be crazy bc it cant be controled after release.
78.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
if you train an agent on long running tasks (like 5 hour autonomous coding tasks) it is practice for the system to learn various behaviors, some of which are dangouus. I link an example of one of these behaviors in the wild, in which an LLM
79.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
if you disagree with what I say above, reply with why also if those eginers do read gwern and watch dwarkesh, then shouldn't they have picked up on talk of x-risk? this doesn't add up
80.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
pi.dev,I like minimalism
81.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
and now this reminds me of kolmogorov complexity
82.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
id love it if their last model, like some sorta far-ASI, in context RSI monster, be called `claude fin`
83.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
thx adding a mode on this that prevents animations would be nice addition tho
84.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
feels like an onion headline. crazy times
85.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
> They were not at all concerned with some kind of hostile / AGI takeover scenario. this doesn't sound belivable, or at least it seems off. competent ai engineers should have good intution about how agents work, and what happen
86.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
I like listening to something really droney and moving (~tornado sirens) while I work. also anki, anki makes studying easier,m
87.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
been thinking, and ngl, this has probably already been happening in their models. I'm sure the other labs probably do the same. just self host at this point
88.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
unless you could convince them that making smarter-than-human AI is bad. it would be nice if we all thought this. instead they should figure out how to make dumb models faster or more efficient, that's safe
89.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
> like they've repeatedly pursued). source?
90.
by sometimelurker 4mo ago
crashes aren't shortable unless you know exactly when they are going to happen

More ›