somerandomdudes

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   It is not worthless. But you have to evaluate the argument on its own, not act as if it from some authority on the topic because it is from some googler.
2. 2.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   This is really some random dude. If the dude posted it on his personal blog HN wouldn't pay any attention to it, but because it is a "leak" of an "internal Google document" somehow it becomes more valuable than it r
3. 3.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   yes, I do.
4. 4.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   People are appealing to some kind of "authority" regarding these opinion docs from random dudes working at Google where if they knew the dude's name rather than the fact that they work at Google they would not.
5. 5.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   Google has thousands of so called AI/ML "researchers". The author has ZERO publications in top AI/ML conferences.
6. 6.▲
   by somerandomdudes 3y ago

   I am amazed that people haven't gotten used to these "internal Google doc leaks". This is just the opinion of some random googler, one among over 100,000. For some reason random googlers seem like to write random docs on hot